User talk:Kristmace
Pearl Jam/Metallica album sales
Well i was never thinking of US domestic sales, rather then worldwide sales. The quote says "the most popular American rock & roll band of the '90s" not "the most popular American rock & roll band of the '90s' in the US". And you dont give any source for what you wrote in my talk page, all seems very far fetched, considering that RIAA has The Black Album on 14 million and Ten on 12 million, so from 1999 to today Black Album has sold 5 million and Pearl Jam barley 1 million? It seems likley that Metallica sold a clear majority of their albums in the 1990's considering they didnt hit the mainstream until then, and Metallica has an staggering lead in sales (30 vs 58). And by the way, read WP:NOR. You cant use this as an source. So unless you have a reliable source that clearly states that Pearl Jam sold most records during the 1990s, it ain't going to cut it. As you said it's not foolproof and it can hardly be accepted as an source in an article. Regards --Nirvana77 (talk) 16:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate and respect your work, concern and the fact that you can have a civil discussion about something (Not that ordinary at Wikipedia these days imo). And i think your absolutely right about it being very subjective and not just pure numbers. I would be fine with it if the article pointed out that it was an music journalist making the statement. I can also see how it's can go against WP:worldwide view. But im fine with an eventual and mutual agreement on something that all are contempt with. Regards --Nirvana77 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Please see my comments about this on the Pearl Jam talk page. I think the statement that Pearl Jam was one of the most popular bands of the 90's is fine. NMBJ69 (talk) 03:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Proposed Merger
I have proposed that the article Latter-day Saint is merged with the Latter Day Saint article to avoid confusion. My points for this merger are as follows:
- Having two articles titled Latter Day Saint, albeit with slight grammatical variance is very confusing to the average user, and one who may be looking up information. Yes, they mean different things, but the Latter Day Saint article covers the different uses and list denominations within the movement.
- The first paragraph of the Latter-day Saint article contains information on the reasons for this different spelling. These reasons are adequately covered in the other article under Uses of the Term and in the article on the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
- The second paragraph contains uncited statistics and vague membership and growth statements that are properly covered in the article Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints with references.
- The article therefore contains no unique information, as I've covered in my last two points.
- The Latter-day Saint article should properly be linked to a disambiguation page where the user can select from numerous articles including Latter Day Saint, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Latter Day Saint movement and possibly Mormon to avoid potential confusion and duplication of information.
- This is a common link page from other articles because of this confusion. Those articles should properly be directed to the page Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Kristmace 16:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thx - I will consider the info above before responding/commenting. (on the talk page) --Trödel 17:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Stone Gossard article
I added another sentence to the recognition article. I don't see anywhere else it could be incorporated into the article besides its own section. I'll be on the look out for anything else that can be added to the section if I come across it. Thanks for helping.-5- (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
Issue 14 - May 2008 | |
|
Seraphim Whipp, Guitardude3600, Lunar Jesters, Kristmace, Freedom (song), TwentiethApril1986, JD554, Thom, and Sethward joined the alternative music fold during May.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative music newsletter
Issue 15 - June 2008 | |
|
Fvasconcellos and Alternative_Idiot joined the alternative music fold during June.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2008
Issue 16 - July 2008 | |
|
Arbocalaviv, Samushi101, Carbonrodney, Red157, and dmodlin71 joined the alternative music fold during July.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 03:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for August 2008
Issue 17 - August 2008 | |
|
Corythepaperboy, Hiram111, Yozzer66, and Lugnuts joined the alternative music fold during August.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 21:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for September 2008
Issue 18 - September 2008 | |
|
ThinkBlue joined the alternative music fold during September.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 20:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Main Page redesign
The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, PretzelsTalk! 10:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for October 2008
SoxBot II (talk) 02:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for November 2008
Issue 20 - November 2008 | |
|
A Stop at Willoughby and Trap The Drum Wonder joined the alternative music fold during November.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 02:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for December 2008
Issue 21 - December 2008 | |
|
Papa November and S. Dean Jameson joined the alternative music fold during December.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for February 2009
Issue 23 - February 2009 | |
|
MikeGruz and Blackadam2 joined the alternative music fold during February.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 03:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for March 2009
Issue 24 - March 2009 | |
|
LizParker and Cavie78 joined the alternative music fold during March.
|
SoxBot II (talk) 02:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for April 2009
Issue 25 - April 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot (talk) 10:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for May 2009
Issue 26 - May 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot (talk) 10:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for June 2009
Issue 27 - June 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot (talk) 22:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for July 2009
Issue 28 - July 2009 | |
|
Guitarherochristopher and Andrzejbanas joined the alternative music fold during July.
|
SoxBot (talk) 08:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for August 2009
Issue 29 - August 2009 | |
|
Dylan620, SteelersFan UK06, Guitarherochristopher and Thatguykalem joined the alternative music fold during August.
|
SoxBot (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
York meetup
Hi Kristmace. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
![]() |
ICHTHUS |
January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Leeds meetup
Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Kristmace. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Called to Serve for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Called to Serve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Called to Serve until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 20:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Kristmace. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Kristmace. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MTV Unplugged (Pearl Jam album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legacy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)