User talk:Krish Rajawat

Hello Krish Rajawat. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to LambdaTest, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Krish Rajawat. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Krish Rajawat|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samia Gore, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ~Styyx^Talk? 11:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samia Gore, you may be blocked from editing. DreamRimmer (talk) 09:40, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not paid article so why you are doing Krish Rajawat (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the original creator of the article. How do you know? ~Styyx^Talk? 10:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]