User talk:Knightrises10/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
6		Family of Bahram Khan (talk)	Add sources
7		RVA Magazine (talk)	Add sources
1,224		Windows 95 (talk)	Add sources
67		Azadi march (talk)	Add sources
1,912		Hania Amir (talk)	Add sources
216		MJ Jenkins (talk)	Add sources
4,492		The Shield (professional wrestling) (talk)	Cleanup
67		History of the Indian Air Force (talk)	Cleanup
35		Point 5353 (talk)	Cleanup
21,038		Imran Khan (talk)	Expand
20		Durch die Nacht mit … (talk)	Expand
6,976		Jawani Phir Nahi Ani 2 (talk)	Expand
297		Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,544		Draco Malfoy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
39		Digvijay Singh (Bihar politician) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,498		Bing (search engine) (talk)	Merge
93		Rolling distribution (talk)	Merge
233		Dress uniform (talk)	Merge
212		Islam and children (talk)	Wikify
66		Defence Housing Authority, Karachi (talk)	Wikify
354		Sharif family (talk)	Wikify
4		2017 Lahore explosion (talk)	Orphan
5		Omar Acha (talk)	Orphan
70		Mobilegeddon (talk)	Orphan
630		Maula Jatt 2 (talk)	Stub
40		Maira Khan (talk)	Stub
158		ARY Films (talk)	Stub
20		Gone Thursday (talk)	Stub
3,356		Sportacus (talk)	Stub
9		Madhav University (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey TKR, I don't know if you know this, but I replied to your email. Keep up the good work. JC7V-constructive zone 16:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Hey..sorry I meant to put why I updated it but I am the artist and I didn't think the last paragraph was true and/or necessary. I wasn't sure where to put that information - from computerd8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Computerd8 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Knightrises10. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.JC7V-constructive zone 16:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 18:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Mz7. Knightrises10 (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Knightrises10. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Adam Nelson 06 (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Knightrises10,

Unregistered editors cannot create articles on Wikipedia, but they can use the articles for creation process to submit drafts that registered editors can either accept and publish or decline. WikiProject Articles for creation is looking for experienced editors who want to partake in this peer review process. If you have what it takes to get involved, then please take a look at the reviewing instructions. To discuss specific AfC reviews, do so freely on the designated talk page.

There is currently a backlog of over 3700 drafts (287 very old).

If you know an editor who may be willing to help out, please use the template you are currently reading {{subst:WPAFCInvite}} to draw attention to this WikiProject. Many hands make light work!

—AE (talk • contributions) 05:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@Abelmoschus Esculentus: Hi, thanks. However, I think I don't meet the criteria yet. But I will surely take part in it once I meet this criteria. Knightrises10 (talk) 05:54, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Great. Look forward to seeing you in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants! —AE (talk • contributions) 06:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I'm a Wikipedia user who created the NWA Oriental Heavyweight Championship page. I'd like to ask you why you move the document. Because I'm a non-English-speaking Wikipedia user, I can not understand what is "Undersourced" mean. Can you tell me What is lacking in the NWA Oriental Heavyweight Championship document? Grampus (talk) 10:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@Grampus: Hi, you actually need to add more citations/sources/references from the news. I moved your article to draftspace because it was undersourced, which means you need to add more reliable references. This way, you can edit and take time without the fear of getting it deleted. Once completed, you can submit the draft for review.

Thanks, Happy Editing - Knightrises10 (talk) 10:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I understand. Grampus (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear,Knightrises10

Thank You For Giving Me Your Thoughts On My Recent Contribution To Wikipedia.Your E-Mail Has Been Read.If You Would Like To Edit To My New Article.I Will E-mail You Again About The First E-mail Regarding My Article. Kindest Regards,

Adam Nelson 06 (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

If You Need Anything Please DON'T Be Ashamed To Leave A Message On My Talk Page OR E-mail.Thanks Adam Nelson 06 (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

I Would Like To Be Your Friend Adam Nelson 06 (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@Knightrises10:Dear Knightrises10, I've added the definition on funds transfer while I was was reviewing the Electronic funds transfer wiki page wich was tagged as without source. I thought I would have been better to create a new page with the "broader concept" of fund transfer instead of adding that definition inside a more specifice page. Please consider that page a definition only. Nicola Caione (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
436		Allirajah Subaskaran (talk)	Add sources
5,491		Sergio Ramos (talk)	Add sources
2,240		Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 (talk)	Add sources
382		Shane Watson (talk)	Add sources
84		ICC ODI Team of the Year (talk)	Add sources
585		Demographics of Pakistan (talk)	Add sources
1,031		Kumar Sangakkara (talk)	Cleanup
197		Open Windows (film) (talk)	Cleanup
55		Ruk Jaana Nahin (talk)	Cleanup
136		Drought in India (talk)	Expand
459		Cinema of Pakistan (talk)	Expand
34		Converting Vegetarians II (talk)	Expand
95		Huccha Venkat (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
899		Sacco and Vanzetti (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
5,212		Infinity Gems (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
259		Miss Diva (talk)	Merge
436		Aksar (talk)	Merge
353		Los Bandoleros (film) (talk)	Merge
890		Jesse Bradford (talk)	Wikify
973		Belladonna (actress) (talk)	Wikify
85		Gender inequality in China (talk)	Wikify
11		Nikhat Mariyam Neerushaa (talk)	Orphan
10		Action based learning questions (talk)	Orphan
6		Aarav Singh (talk)	Orphan
152		Dil Diya Hai (talk)	Stub
57		Reham Khan (memoir) (talk)	Stub
3,637		Payal Rajput (talk)	Stub
93		Yodha (1991 film) (talk)	Stub
11		Deoli, Maharashtra (talk)	Stub
40		Anjum Shahzad (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Knightrises10. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.JC7V7DC5768

JC7V-constructive zone 01:27, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

@JC7V7DC5768: Replied. Knightrises10 (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
48		Abida Hussain (talk)	Add sources
219		Kondzilla (talk)	Add sources
104		Phon (talk)	Add sources
6		Kuntighat (talk)	Add sources
8		Sabzazar (talk)	Add sources
24		Panchjanya (magazine) (talk)	Add sources
19		Battle of Beth Zechariah (talk)	Cleanup
170		Bigg Boss Halla Bol (talk)	Cleanup
12,336		Akshay Kumar (talk)	Cleanup
22		ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year (talk)	Expand
43		Ya Rab (talk)	Expand
20		Justice Chowdhary (talk)	Expand
932		Doctor Faustus (play) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
44		G. M. Syed (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,669		Mamnoon Hussain (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
48		Prime Ministerial Limousine (talk)	Merge
8		Anupam Sen (talk)	Merge
64		Affordability of housing in the United Kingdom (talk)	Merge
255		Shehla Raza (talk)	Wikify
32		Spiritual naturalism (talk)	Wikify
186		Drew Gooden (talk)	Wikify
5		Alex Hankey (talk)	Orphan
10		Namita Shetty (talk)	Orphan
26		Ayurvedic acupressure (talk)	Orphan
20		Lady Abdullah Haroon (talk)	Stub
246		Manpreet Brar (talk)	Stub
25		Aniket Choudhary (talk)	Stub
156		SNAC (talk)	Stub
63		Allah Ke Banday (talk)	Stub
13		G. Allana (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Knightrises10, Yes this will be a long process that i should not rush. I am definitely going to keep reading all the links you have sent me. Carolcappetta (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

@Carolcappetta: Best wishes and happy editing . Knightrises10 (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Is it possible that someone else will help with this article ? seems like so many people are contributing to these articles ? Carolcappetta (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

@Carolcappetta: Umm.. I can't say anything. If someone is interested, they might help you. I would have helped you too if I had enough time, but I remain busy in real life. I might help you in the coming days, if you need some. By the way, have you read WP:N to see if the subject of your article is considered notable according to Wikipedia policies? Knightrises10 (talk) 19:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

I understand :-) I will cross my fingers that help will arrive at some point, because i know i will need it. I am reading the wiki policies right now. Carolcappetta (talk) 19:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC) @Carolcappetta: They will surely help you. I can provide you more links if you need help. Knightrises10 (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC) That would be very helpful, also as long as this stays in draft mode, am i safe from getting deleted ? Carolcappetta (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

@Carolcappetta: Yes, it won't be deleted as long as its in the draft. That's the benefit of a draft; you can freely create the article without any major interference. Knightrises10 (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Thats great to know, i also created a very basic Wikidata page on Derek with a picture, but realized that without sitselinks, it could get deleted Carolcappetta (talk) 19:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Knightrises10. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.JC7V-constructive zone 20:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

@JC7V7DC5768: Thanks for the reply. Can you also tell me how can we know if an article is already GA or featured quality? Knightrises10 (talk) 01:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Knightrises, this on top of an article means that it is a Good article. A Featured Article will have this on the top of a page. Hope that helps.JC7V-constructive zone 01:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

@JC7V7DC5768: Thanks :) Knightrises10 (talk) 02:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

That was NOT vandalism. Kindly reference my topic on this talk page so I don't have to repeat myself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abelmoschus_Esculentus Crogonint (talk) 06:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Knightrises10 ! I admire your work for article Saaya Now can you please help me to vote for Faysal Manzoor Khan, creator of Saaya at his deletion page because he is behind all the success that the TV serial achieved so can you please vote Keep for him. Thanks ! Lillyput4455talk Lillyput4455 (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Lillyput4455 it is against Wikipedia rules to try to influence other users into making decisions on an Afd. Please don't do that again 6Packs (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

		The Good Friend Award
		This is for your valuable advises given to me about guidelines of deletion. Thank you for your help. This is for you. Thank you. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

@Path slopu: Thanks a lot Path slopu . Knightrises10 (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

If you like, you can join this wikiproject. Please help to make it a good wikiproject. Thank you--PATH SLOPU ^(Talk) 15:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Riaz Ahmed, Knightrises10!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I moved the article to Riaz Ahmed as that's the name given in the cited reference. It would also be helpful if you add Template:DEFAULTSORT to any biographies you create.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 16:37, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

I understand this didn't work. If you like, maybe try this. I haven't tried it, though. (The channel is #wikipedia-en) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Knightrises, firstly thank you for dealing with the vandalism at Salman of Saudi Arabia and Mohammad bin Salman, which has been a problem from time to time – Mohammad bin Salman had pending changes protection for a few months which helped.

Secondly, as the protection on Salman of Saudi Arabia has ended, would you be happy to add the two sections we discussed here? Tarafa15 (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

@Tarafa15: Done, since they were properly sourced :-) Knightrises10 (talk) 15:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much, that's much appreciated.

On a side note, I don’t know if you’ve looked much at Saudi Arabia, but I posted posted on the talk page last week about a section which is largely copied and pasted from a section in Mohammad bin Salman. As I've said in that post (and in the thread below it), it’s important info but in my view it could a) be expanded and updated and b) would be best in the relevant sections of Saudi Arabia, i.e. Women, Tourism, Arts and entertainment, and Religion in Society. I drafted some possible new paragraphs (here) for those sections.

I appreciate there’s quite a lot to go through there in my user space, but if you do have a spare moment to have a look at any point it would be very much appreciated. Thanks again. Tarafa15 (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your help! And I know for several references, luckily I understand them because they are in my mother language (Serbian). I can add biography and filmography that include many references. Thanks again. Serbian Nickmen (talk) 07:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Serbian Nickmen Happy Editing :-) Knightrises10 (talk) 07:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Is it OK now? If something mischievous or something else can be added, feel free to say. I apologize for possible grammatical errors in the text. Thank you. :) Serbian Nickmen (talk) 08:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Serbian Nickmen I'll check it later :-) Till then you may add more references if possible. Knightrises10 (talk) 08:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Do You Think That Adam Nelson_06 IS A BULLY?????

Reece-07 (talk) 12:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Hey — I noticed that you wrote on Cullen328's talk page about mobile editing. I am on the Reading Web team and as described in this year's Annual Plan we're working on making it "easier for someone to contribute productively to Wikimedia projects on a mobile device, leading to more mobile edits and higher retention". We're not working on the editor itself (another team is doing that), but rather all of the supporting elements that are fundamental to editing (history, watchlist, user contribs, etc.).

To start this work we're redesigning the navigation for logged-in users (potentially behind an opt-in "advanced" mode). If you have some time to check out our designs and leave feedback that would be fantastic, given your experience and insights. You can do so here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AHollender (WMF) (talk • contribs) 15:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

• Crash Janssen (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:TR Ericsson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

How to improve my article.

It is not completely clear to me what is needed to qualify this article. Could the notability issue be solved by adding a citation from an essay or press review? Or by adding links to the essays by Barbara Tannenbaum and Arnaud Gerspacher and/or the Yale University Press website? Could you inform me about the best way to proceed? Crash Janssen (talk) 13:25, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

@Crash Janssen: Hello! I rejected the draft and left a reasonable that it has insufficient sources to identify if the subject is notable. The notability issue could be solved by adding reliable sources that are independent of the subject. "A press release is clearly not an independent source as it is usually written either by the business or organization it is written about, or by a business or person hired by or affiliated with the organization ". Similarly, the essays you listed are again not reliable since they are merely views of individuals. You may cite sources from reliable and reputable news, magazines, or books. See WP:RS for more help regarding reliable sources. If you need more help, you can leave me a message here :-) Haopy editing! Knightrises10 talk 13:54, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Knightrises, thanks for having a look at Saudi Arabia and my suggestions here. As the Recent political and economic changes section was mostly copied and pasted from Mohammad bin Salman, my thinking was that anything in that section on women’s rights could be redrafted as a ‘Reforms’ subsection at the end of the Women section, and anything that’s not about women's rights – tourism, arts, etc. – could be added to where appropriate and placed in those relevant sections. So the Culture section would then look like this (diff) with additions to the Religion in society section, another sentence in the Arts and entertainment section, two new sentences in the Sport section, and the new subsection in the Women section. And the Tourism section would look like this (diff). Let me know what you make of these suggestions and thanks again. Tarafa15 (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

@Tarafa15: I'm a bit busy in real life, so I might not be able to look onto it until the weekend. However, if I get some time, I will surely look at them before . Till then, can you clarify if this request is same as the previous ones? Thanks, Knightrises10 talk 14:59, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi – sure of course, thank you. Yes it’s the same request. Tarafa15 (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Knightrises, just coming back to this - let me know if you’ve got a moment to take a look at these suggestions, and if I can help at all. Thanks very much. Tarafa15 (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done Except that tourism section, because I think that so much detail should be added to the main article. However, I will review that again and think over it :-) Let me know if other things are correct. Knightrises10 talk 21:11, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you !voted "keep" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Act 2 Cam, and commented that the article is well sourced, and has enough coverage required for WP:GNG. How did you come to that conclusion? I took a close look at the references, and found that none of them meet the requirements, as they are either not secondary, not independent, or not significant coverage of the company itself. There are three references that are not online, but they appear to be similar to the others. I made a list at Talk:Act 2 Cam, maybe you could take a look and see if you think I've made any mistakes? Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 14:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Knightrises10. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ~ Rob13Talk 17:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knightrises10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe that I never used any other account. When I joined Wikipedia, I always spent times in reading policies and I am well aware of the fact that using multiple accounts for wrong reasons is not allowed. As you can see from my edit history, I always made constructive edits. I made improvements to articles, tried to save a few of them from deletion, while also participating in Afds. I had also been fighting vandalism and was learning more of it at CVUA. Similarly, I had been enrolled at NPP/S as well. I always wanted to help the project in the best way possible. I made mistakes, but never vandalised, and never made bad faith edits. For one of the socks claimed, I can see from the edit history that they had been vandalising Wikipedia, and I reverted their edits. As told before, I patrol recent changes, and might have come across like that. An example is this. In fact, I was the one who reported this account. For the next account, I just came to know that they once vandalised my talk page here. I don't know why I didn't see that time, but AE reverted those edits, and then the user began to vandalise their talk page as you can see here. I don't see any connection with me. Then comes the next account, which had actually nominated an article for deletion, and the only thing I did was voting,see this. I am well aware that Checkuser evidence saw those accounts to be my sock. But I think they were due to some shared IP address. I also edit at school and they can be a reason too. But I can never ever think of using Wikipedia for wring purposes. I created articles, and always wanted to create more. I hope a CU/Admin will review my request and will do with what they are satisfied. Knightrises10 talk 07:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The checkuser evidence is compelling, and holds across a range of different IPs. Neither coincidence nor the "other people at my school are vandals!" argument is a reasonable explanation. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:38, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui: Thanks for reviewing, but as said before, why would I use different accounts for wrong reasons? And also then report one of them. My edit history shows that all of my edits have been constructive, I would never waste my own time to vandalise Wikipedia. I completely believe in check user evidence, but here there is no more evidence. The edit evidence that was has been completely explained by me. If unblock is not an option now, can you please set an expiry? Knightrises10 talk 07:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

You are not the first person to come up with this idea... Yunshui ^雲_水 07:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Knightrises10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #23105 was submitted on Nov 01, 2018 14:12:20. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

This user has engaged in block evasion, and lied about it, as Betour13 in January, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Note this user has engaged in death threats and so would not normally be a candidate for unblocking at any time in the future. --Yamla (talk) 13:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)