User talk:Kiruning

Hi, Kiruning. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Andrew³²⁷ 16:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kiruning. Please don't re-insert the negative statements into Yohio again. We don't focus on what living people have not done, as that is undue emphasis. The language was unencyclopedic, too: avoid saying that things are "worth noting" (they're not supposed to be in the article if they're not, so that's taken for granted).

Did you notice that I previously semiprotected the article precisely because that same negative text kept being inserted by an IP? Are you related to that IP? In any case, stop putting it back, please.

Incidentally, your citation isn't impressive either. I disagree that TV4 Play's use of the words "Superstjärna i Japan" is particularly "interesting" (as you say in your edit summary). That's TV4's own promotion for their own interview with him. Hardly worth "noting" in his wikipedia bio purely for the purpose of contradicting it, is it? But that is not the most important problem, so please don't bother to scour Swedish press for another use of "Yohio + superstjärna"; the text still wouldn't be appropriate. Please have a look at our policy about biographies of living people, if you haven't already. Bishonen | talk 15:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting that you're watching the article like a hawk, but when I posted on the talk page, you had no interest whatsoever to discuss the topic. Please see what I've written there instead, and please respond to my arguments made there. And no, I'm not related to the IP who re-inserted what I wrote. Kiruning (talk) 00:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even if Bishonen and myself could have responded at the talk page it wouldnt change the fact that your changes was not in accordance to Wkipedia guidelines. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 05:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Like a hawk? :-) Thank you, but I'm not not really. I protected it because of a request on Requests for page protection a while back; I wasn't aware of its existence before that. Compare this section on my talk. But I'm sorry I didn't see your comment on article talk! It must have slid off my watchlist during the night. I've replied to it now, belatedly. Bishonen | talk 13:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

I just wanted to let you now Kiruning that I have reverted your latest edits on Yohio as you seem to be unwilling to leave the Big in Japan claim alone and frankly your edits did not improve the article. Regards--BabbaQ (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May I also suggest that you adjust your tone at talk pages. The message about Bishonen at Yohios talk page is not only rude but unnecessary.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're unnecessary.Kiruning (talk) 04:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed this comment. And this is exactly the reason to why I will ignore you now. It is impossible to have a discussion with someone who is obviously unwilling to even keep it at a mature level. Perhaps someone else will have the energy to discuss with you, good luck.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:22, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only you actually declared you would ignore me 30 minutes before [1] you just saw that comment, but nice try at retconning. Kiruning (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just another proof of your unwillingness to even pretend to be polite. But hey, good for you... Goodbye now.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to William Matheson, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yintan  14:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you "made a mistake." The redir is not helpful, the two links leading to that page are both about other people who happen to share one praticular thing with the Norwegian judge: their last name. Wilhelm and William on the other hand are two distinct names.Kiruning (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big in Japan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then what about danish names in articles of towns in Slesvig? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flensburg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niebüll etc. Besta hilsna IP — Preceding unsigned comment added by By the way, i didnt change the Hven article 95.166.124.210 (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.166.124.210 (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1969, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democratic Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Nichiren Shōshū. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 22:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Might need some input from you on latest discussion on above mentioned article.--Catflap08 (talk) 15:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, which discussion was this?Kiruning (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soka Gakkai daimoku chant, Kesennuma, March 11 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better have a look at the page and talk page --Catflap08 (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chen Xuening, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chen Xuening and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chen Xuening, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kiruning! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 14:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanhe was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A one-sentence "article" is useless. Please expand with more content before submitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chen Xuening and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chen Xuening, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zanhe (talk) 04:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chen Xuening, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kiruning. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chen Xuening".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]