User talk:Kiraroshi1976/Archive 13
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willem van Oranje (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Fixed on May 4, 2017 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barkley L. Hendricks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Fixed on May 4, 2017 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Financial Stability Oversight Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Executive Order. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Fixed on May 4, 2017 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Executive Order 13792
Thanks for expanding this article. Just FYI, there are redirects for (I think) all of Trump's executive orders, so feel free to take a stab at expanding others. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: You are welcome. I'll look into the others as time permits. I don't know how to upload images or I would have done so for the page and other pages. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please, do not add diminutives to the subjects name, as you did with Jim Ross, which I had previously removed. Please see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies/2017 archive#RfC: Clarification and/or change in how common hypocorisms (diminutives) are handled on first use of name. (I do wish the name of the discussion was shorter. lol) (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 00:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Crash Underride:Thank-you. I shall not do that again. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- I appreciate it. If you'd be interested in helping me remove them, I'd appreciate it. I use the edit summary of "Per: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies/2017 archive#RfC: Clarification and/or change in how common hypocorisms (diminutives) are handled on first use of name" when I do it so people won't complain. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 06:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Crash Underride: I will do the best I can as time permits. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- I appreciate it. If you'd be interested in helping me remove them, I'd appreciate it. I use the edit summary of "Per: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies/2017 archive#RfC: Clarification and/or change in how common hypocorisms (diminutives) are handled on first use of name" when I do it so people won't complain. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 06:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Total Divas
Hi there, I am being accused of added copyright content to the Total Divas plot summary page by another user. Would you kindly have a look and let me know if this is true, or not? The said user has deleted all of the plot summaries and I do not wish to engage in an edit war so I am not reverting at this point until this issue is resolved. I have also left a section on the Total Divas talk page for discussion about this. Please let me know what the deal is, thanks. MSMRHurricane (talk) 06:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Have you looked over the reverted material the other user has removed? Does that fall under any copyright violations? MSMRHurricane (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- @MSMRHurricane: I looked. I dd not see much of it as copyright violations, but I am slowly putting the summaries back in my own words so that there will be no problems. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 22:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. However, can't we just revert it and re-word the summaries so they're more "original"? I feel it's such a waste of time to put it all back together over one user - who I believe - is falsely claiming copyright violations and disrupting the page that has had no sort of trouble like this in the past. Would you be willing to back me up on that? Because I'm willing to revert the other season pages - seeing as season 6 has already started to be put back together - and notify this user that they are wrong and they need to back off. And no, I am not claiming "territory rights" over the article, but I am tired of this user disrupting the page with their wrongful accusations. They tried this before on the character table on the main page by removing the 'WWE Superstar' titles next to some of the recurring cast and claimed it was advertising and promoting, yet that was all made up because they didn't want it there. What do you say? MSMRHurricane (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- @MSMRHurricane: As that person seems to see it as such, I will need to re-do each page 'without reverts so that person will not revert the page and cause edit wars. It is just preferable over edit wars. If that person says that I have violated copyrights, then I will have it arbutrated by someone higher up. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
"Slide" music genre
Hi User:Kiraroshi1976, asking you because you're a responsible editor. I sourced all the genres on Slide (Calvin Harris song) myself a while back, but knowing what I know now I'm not sure whether they're directly calling this song these genres or the production/or sections of the song. Can you please take a close look at these sources ([1], [2], [3]) and let me know if you think they're worded in a way that makes it appropriate to be used as genres on page? Thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Theo Mandela:: Looking at the article and the references you gave, all I could find was the one you have listed on the page. Google lists it as dance/electronic, however, there are no sources stating it is that. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- All good User:Kiraroshi1976, and thanks for fixes on Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 1. 👍--Theo Mandela (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Theo Mandela:: You are most welcome for both. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 22:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Total Divas
Hi again, I restored the summaries for seasons 2 - 5 on the Total Divas pages, and I went through every summary, changing and rephrasing, editing and deleting content that didn't seem to fit, to avoid these ridiculous copyright violation accusations. Would you please help me out? Like you said, you saw absolutely no copyright violation in the summaries you were restoring yourself, therefore I really think we need to tell this user to stop "throwing their weight around" with these accusations. The summaries have been edited, so I really think this user is doing this to spite me personally. They have now reported me also, which I really think is unfair seeing as I think this user is wrongly accusing me for such drastic reasons. Please, would you take a look at whatever you need to and get back to me? Appreciate it. MSMRHurricane (talk) 04:49, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- @MSMRHurricane: See updated Total Divas (season 5). - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- @MSMRHurricane: The reference is because they dated and stopped well before the episode aired. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 00:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oh true, fair enough. Sorry for removing it. MSMRHurricane (talk) 03:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- @MSMRHurricane: The reference is because they dated and stopped well before the episode aired. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 00:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- @MSMRHurricane: No problem. I just hope that what I did helped. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 13:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you. However, it honestly would be great if you could say something to that user, I believe his way of editing is very much like bullying... you said so yourself that you didn't see any copyright violations so why not bring that to his attention? I also went through every summary and re-edited them to avoid further copyright violations but he yet again removes them and reports me to the administrations. Would you be so kind in supporting me against him? As I feel he will see reason or back off entirely if another user threw in their opinion. Or if you simply just don't want to get involved or believe he's in the right, then that's fine, just let me know please. Thanks! MSMRHurricane (talk) 19:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Template:Marriage instructions
Template:Marriage instructions do specify that that "End" field is to be used to indicate the "date the marriage was dissolved or the spouse of the article's subject died." Notice the omission of the only other circumstance, when the article's subject dies. Davejohnsan (talk) 03:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of executive actions by Donald Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acquisition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Presidency of Donald Trump
Material you copied to the above article from List of executive actions by Donald Trump appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-judge-blocks-trumps-third-travel-ban/2017/10/17/e73293fc-ae90-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed and paraphrased. I left in as much as I could, and also I cleaned List of executive actions by Donald Trump. Please leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Executive Order 13224
In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}}
after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewing
![]() |
Hello, Kiraroshi1976.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. |
I notice that you have the "administrator someday" userbox. Reviewing new pages is one of the best ways to develop experience needed to successfully wield the mop. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 10:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Insertcleverphrasehere: I would like to become a reviewer. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 03:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Have a read of the tutorial linked above, and when you feel like you have a decent enough understanding of the process, feel free to apply for the New Page Reviewer user-right at WP:PERM. However, the recent copyright issues discussed above might be a stumbling block if not easily explained (if both are from public domain it is probably fine). — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 04:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Kiraroshi1976. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Longest Day (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Fixed. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 14:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Springfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Neutral notice
A move request regarding Deadline.com / Deadline Hollywood, an article you have edited, is taking place at Talk:Deadline Hollywood#Requested move 11 March 2018. It is scheduled to end in seven days.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Tenebrae: I provided my input, however, I think there should be more history for the page, - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 00:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)