User talk:KimoLborough
Appearance
Test
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 13:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies, that was a mistake at my end. KimoLborough (talk) 13:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also, what is your connection to the user Shaheerahmedkhand32? Canterbury Tail talk 13:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't have any connection to this account.I recently, activated my current account and this is the only account that i'll be using. Thanks KimoLborough (talk) 13:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also, what is your connection to the user Shaheerahmedkhand32? Canterbury Tail talk 13:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. --Blablubbs (talk) 00:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- Good catch User:Canterbury Tail (a CU also found a third). DMacks (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)