User talk:Kanguole

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. I prefer to keep conversations together in one place: If it's about the content of some article, I'd rather discuss it on that article's Talk page. If I've posted on your talk page, I'll be watching it for your reply. Otherwise, I'll generally respond here to comments that are posted here, and ping you.

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, finishing up the Ryukyu stuff today. However, I just had the thought; have you checked out the WP:DISCORD? Me, Remsense, and a few other folks have been working together on some Chinese archaeological and history topics there, and I thought that might be the kinda thing you'd be interested in joining. And I for one would love to have you and your expertise on Shang topics there to poke sometimes! :) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalissima: Thanks very much for the invite, but it isn't really my thing. Very happy to talk about these things anywhere on the wiki, though. Kanguole 21:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! One question I had; in Cambridge's The Archaeology of China (Liu & Chen, 2012), it makes reference to the Erligang state, the Erlitou state, etc. is the idea that the Erligang and Erlitou cultures can be analyzed as cohesive states universal, or is that still debated? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is common, though perhaps Erlitou is a bit controversial. Bagley even calls Erligang an empire. Campbell is a bit skeptical and apt to use scare quotes around "state", but I don't think I've seen him address the issue directly. Kanguole 23:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]