User talk:Judas278
Scjesseys back at it
As you can see here Scjessey is back at it attempting to push through changes for the Dreamhost article that don't seem all that neutral. Do you think we might be able to convince this editor to respect neutrality by discussing this matter with him on his talkpage or do you have any suggestions regarding what we could possibly do about this?--194x144x90x118 (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Colloborate with me on the afd
Lets work out a good text to make the afd with, if we make the strongest possible AfD then it's more likely that the article will end.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt notice -- I had just spotted it in Recent Changes when my orange bar lit up. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. Thank you for the notification. -- Scjessey (talk) 18:17, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of DreamHost
I am unsure why I received a notification for this. Please explain. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 22:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I see. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 01:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration request filed
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#DreamHost and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Humor
Gotta admit, my wife would probably agree with you on that one... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
ownership
you might want to include this diff in your evidence [[1]] Theserialcomma (talk) 18:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Offer
See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#DreamHost and my comments there. Instead of blocking your account indefinitely, I would accept a pledge from you to stop commented on and interacting with Scjessey (talk · contribs). Using this account and your prior account, you seem to have come to Wikipedia specifically to make trouble for them. It is one thing to raise legitimate concerns; it is another to carry on chasing one user to the exclusion of all other activities. Jehochman Talk 17:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Interesting. Scjessey runs an off-wiki "outing" harassment site, and (you say) I'm the one wiki-hounding. I hadn't used the word "whitewash" but it fits. I came to Wikipedia because DreamHost was being whitewashed. Scjessey was the "painter." DreamHost was my only involvement, so "chasing" is a bit strong. I came to see if the little DreamHost backwater could be cleaned up. Anyway, even if you missed it at DreamHost (it's there), at least some of Scjessey's bad behavior (incivility, stalking, edit-warring) has been recognized and treated. OK, that's my last comment. Let the whitewashing continue. I certainly will stop commenting and interacting with Scjessey. Judas278 (talk) 23:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nice work Jehocman driving a good contributor away that was having a positive influence on an article dominated by a very negative influence to say the least really. I hate to see this happen this leave me to fight the advertising campaign being attempted over at Dreamhost, I'd like to ask you to apologize to this user and to ask him to reconsider retirement.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)