User talk:Jstar Ahmed

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Uttam Kumar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not add unsourced WP:PUFFERY and do not remove sources. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uttam Kumar filmography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding unsourced content and stop WP:PUFFERY (praise filled writing) like :"all his films are an asset". Wikipedia is not a tabloid or forum. It is an encyclopedia. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Uttam Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Uttam Kumar. Don't you get it? We cannot have unsourced content per our policy WP:V. Everything you write need to be sourced. This is your final warning. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add unsourced content. Anything we add needs to be sourced per WP:Verifiability policy, which you are not doing. A basic policy and guideline, failing to conform with it may result your user ID getting blocked. Secondly, we maintain WP:Neutrality in the article, per which we cannot write praise-filled adjectives and claims (See also WP:PUFFERY). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for a week for continuing to add unsourced puffery despite repeated warnings. PhilKnight (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jstar Ahmed, you were blocked before for adding WP:PUFFERY. Don't add unnecessary stuff in the article. It is an encyclopedia. Also do not use IMDb as source. It is considered unreliable. Read our policies WP:RS, WP:CITINGIMDB, WP:PUFFERY. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uttam Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sumitra Devi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Grihadaha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Storchy (talk) 15:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Oz\^InterAct 08:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Grihadaha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 08:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Uttam Kumar

added links pointing to Nayak and Basu Poribar

Chowringhee (film)

added a link pointing to Grand Hotel

Ogo Bodhu Shundori

added a link pointing to Dadu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Uttam Kumar. Storchy (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 22:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 22:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jstar Ahmed. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grihadaha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jstar Ahmed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grihadaha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jstar Ahmed. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grihadaha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]