User talk:Jonmillsswns

Hello, Jonmillsswns. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit on wikipedia, so, if you like, just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, and ignore all rules, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people. I suggest that you try to improve a few articles first, before you make your own. Maybe look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references. If you need help, please ask! Edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes. Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. If you want to know more, there's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of wikipedia! --  Chzz  ►  Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

--  Chzz  ►  12:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your activity, username and several other indicators suggest you have a conflict of interest with the article you edit, namely South West News Service. The policy on this suggests your refrain from editing articles where you have a vested interest. Rayman60 (talk) 13:24, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand. However I want to be sure that the info about our company in the public domain is up to date and accurate. I was aware of the conflict of interest so have referenced every fact I made and kept my edit very brief. If there is another way I can achieve the same goal please let me know. Jonmillsswns (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing is a separate issue - every statement by any editor has to be referenced. As for keeping the information up-to-date and accurate, you just have to trust the volunteer editors will do this. It's not a perfect system, but this way we can avoid bias and maintain neutrality. Read through the policy for clarification on what you can and can't do. You should declare your interest and refrain from editing the page yourself, and if there is a serious issue (e.g. libellous or false claim about the company), you can raise this with other editors to address and allow them to fix the article. It's all explained in the policy and you can ask for further assistance at the Teahouse. Rayman60 (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]