User talk:Jongrufy

Please, do not remove speedy deletion template, but contest it on the article talk page. If you continue to do this, you may be considered as vandal and blocked from wikipedia.Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jongrufy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aashiq Ali for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

1. Aashiq Ali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jongrufy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aashiq Ali for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jongrufy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aashiq Ali for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:14, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aashiq Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aashiq Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:09, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Aashiq Ali, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]