User talk:Johnworldpeace

This is a page to discuss matters posted by John WorldPeace with regards to the Spiritual Christianity topic in Wikipedia.

John WorldPeace Johnworldpeace (talk) 15:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A long article about World Peace under the Possibility of WorldPeace was deleted by an anonymous and unrecorded source. I have reposted the article which I wrote and will continue to do so until there is an explaination as to why the article should not remain in this topic. Johnworldpeace (talk) 18:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Hello, Johnworldpeace, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Spiritual Christianity have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 19:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signing name.

Hello Johnworldpeace. Just a note. While you should sign your name in talk pages, please do not do so in the body of the article. It is an unnecessary addition to the page. Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 19:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. 99.168.86.206 (talk) 02:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to World peace. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. TheFeds 02:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Feds,

Sorry that I do not fit into any of your definitions. There are no courses in the universities of the world that deal with the global issues of peace. There are courses that deal with different aspects of peace such as maybe a course about peace advocates. But all peace advocates to date have a local position. No peace advocate has appeared before me to discuss the underlying core impediments to peace on a global all inclusive scale. Said core impediments being race, religion, nationality and the subordination of women world wide.

Therefore there are no third party discussions or university dissertation or published articles because no one has even acknowledged that the subject exists. So what will you do with me? I have defined the subject. I have spent 21 years both advocating, writing and engaging in these areas. Now that I write what I have learned, you say that nothing can be posted because enough time has not passed for the world to wake up to the discussion that I have defined. Therefore, your encyclopedia is nothing more than an archaic and useless meandering about this most important subject WorldPeace.

You can read the postings in this topic and you will see the the discussion is random, disharmonious and chaotic and basically is just a few incoherent quotes. You read what I have posted. Then I think you need to consider that the subject of WorldPeace is one that must proceed outside all your rules to date. The reality is that all the theories to date have not increased the peace much less manifested WorldPeace.

The discussion of WorldPeace is nothing but a circular reiteration of all the things that have never worked. 5000+ years or religion and no religion has manifested peace. Since the history of mankind there have been governments, none of which have manifested peace. Racial wars simply bolster religion and nationalistic wars. And where will the discussion of the subordination of women as an impediment to peace take place in your encyclopedia.

I have my own web page where all this is discussed. I am too far ahead of the rest of the world society to probably ever be included in your encyclopedia. In a word, you dont even understand what I am talking about. And for that reason your rules and structure fail the human society in your over all goal of educating the world human society in order to create understanding and peace. Maybe you do not even know what you are doing. Maybe you need to redefine the whole concept of wikipedia.

Edison tried to cram DC current down the throat of the economy. AC current developed by Tesla who worked for Edison was the future. Well maybe you are the Edison of knowledge. Historical knowledge that is barred from current comments is almost worthless. By the time that a problem is defined the whole environment has changed and the definition is worthless and the discussion meaningless.

Maybe a competing encyclopedia that allows people to speak their mind may be a better vehicle for change. An all inclusive newsgroup. I think we all know that new ideas come from the radicals and misfits and revolutionaries and not the conformist housed in universities.

Do what you want. I am going to play in my own back yard where freedom resides unhampered.

John WorldPeace http://johnworldpeace.com/wikipediaworldpeace.asp