User talk:Jimmaths

March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Ian sloan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cheers, Jonomacdrones _(talk) 09:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jimmaths.

I saw that you recently wrote this article. I've added a couple of references to papers he wrote, or co-authored. Thanks for the contribution! Oh – if you're interested in mathematics, you may want to check out this talk page.

Have a great day! DavidCBryant 14:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have any other information to add to the St John's College, University of Sydney page? Cheers

Hi, I don't think signal processing is a formal science. I have therefore removed Category:Formal sciences from Signal processing. Please see the discussion in the talk page. Cheers, --Zvika (talk) 06:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bess Price may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Price has lost 10 siblings and talks about life in an Aboriginal town camp'], ''NT News'' 9/5/2014.]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You changed one of the dates in this article by more than a century - was that intentional? The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - fixed.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Second scholasticism

added links pointing to Pascal and Locke

Eris O'Brien

added a link pointing to Catholic University of Louvain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seven Bridges of Königsberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aristotelian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:00, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 08:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be mentioning you on NPOV noticeboard, Plimpton 322 9and50swans (talk) 04:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC) Yes, do that. Best of luck with getting action. I notice that one of them has left a rude message on the talk page of my article Ethics in mathematics - but it was earlier than my comment on the Plimpton 322 controversy.[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholic Church in Papua New Guinea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Missionaries of the Sacred Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Papua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethics in mathematics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Objectivity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:01, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian philosophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Causes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ted McGrath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wichita.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingsford, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coogee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i don't know how wikipedia works, but i would really love to talk to you about some of the additions you made to the Timeline of Brisbane wikipedia page? nothing bad!!! i am just really interested in some of your choices! please contact me. The other goku (talk) 09:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this method via Wikipedia works. If you get it, reply. My aim was variety, to cover many aspects of life. Jimmaths (talk) 23:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi Jimmaths, thank you so much for replying! This is a great answer, and makes a lot of sense -- you did some really great work with the Timeline of Brisbane edits! I hope this isn't too much of an imposition, but I am specifically curious about:

(a) the reasoning behind your choice to include the albums 'Internationalist' and the self-titled album from the Veronicas as worthy of inclusion;

(b) are you a fan of those two bands; and

(c) how much do you know about those two albums specifically?

I'm doing an art project that kind of revolves a large part around those two albums, and the fact that they are on the Timeline of Brisbane Wikipedia page. Thank you so much in advance for any answer you are able to provide. Hope you're having a great day! The other goku (talk) 03:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a fan of theirs and know little about their work, or anything else much about that end of popular culture. I am a retired academic interested in philosophy, science etc, so very far from that sort of thing. I'd vaguely heard of The Veronicas and looking up their stuff on Wikipedia gave the impression they could be worth inclusion. Not sure if I was right. Jimmaths (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a wonderful answer, thank you so much for it! I think the inclusion of both is certainly merited, your instinct is correct. I was particularly curious if there was some reason for these two albums (whether it had something to do with both being the third studio album, or some other point of commonality), and over any other Brisbane-originating artist.

Also, if you are at all interested, I would love to tell you all about and possibly get your further thoughts on the art project I am doing; wikipedia will not let me share my email address here (understandably) but if you are interested, I am sure we can figure out another way to communicate, or I can honestly maybe just post the details here.

Hope the rest of your day is really great -- thank you again for answering! The other goku (talk) 04:55, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can try me, but I may not have anything useful to say. You can find my contact details by searching for James Franklin UNSW Jimmaths (talk) 01:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]