User talk:Jejspeak

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jejspeak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my comments are factual and unbiased. They are based on verbal history, and not on written history

Decline reason:

Super. Wikipedia is not based on the oral tradition, and we must abide by reliable sources. Unblocking your account while you are still confused seems like a poor idea. Kuru (talk) 02:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Decline edit conflict) Your unblock request does not provide any appearance that you have taken in the reasons for your block and are going to reform your behavior; that you understand the requirements of verifiability, not posting original research and the need to write neutrally. You also appear to have an agenda involving making edits about the Bilderberg group, and editing with an agenda is never a good thing. If you wish to be unblocked you will need to demonstrate that you understand our policies and will abide by them.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]