User talk:Jchaimo

Welcome!

Hello, Theahl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to American Hockey League may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Providence Reds|Rhode Island Reds]] (1976–1977) became Binghamton Dusters)
AHL Hall of Fame's membership stands at 38.<ref>http://ahlhalloffame.com/honored-members-p139007></ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Theahl, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Theahl! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to David Andrews (ice hockey) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 21:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at David Andrews (ice hockey), you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 21:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jchaimo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked from editing due to promoting business or organization, but edits and external links published were entirely editorial and in no way promotional. Theahl (talk) 23:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You see nothing wrong with "The league’s footprint has grown dramatically during Andrews’ tenure with successful franchises in major North American markets, while Andrews has also worked to ensure the league’s continuing success in smaller historical and traditional markets as well"? If you want to write about "continuing success", you can always do that on your own blog, but it doesn't belong in a neutral encyclopedia. Also, you can't use this username. You will need to propose a new one. The instructions are above. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, promoting your own website is considered promotional. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 01:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jchaimo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

jchaimo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Thank you for clearing up the confusion. I apologize for the inappropriate edits, and for the unapproved username. I will ensure that the site's guidelines and regulations are followed in the future.

Decline reason:

I have changed your username from Theahl. However, since blocks only prevent editing, there is no need to remove the block if you have no intentions of editing. When there is an edit you want to make, you may request unblock at that time. There is no deadline for that, so take all the time you need. 331dot (talk) 13:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What edits do you want to make if unblocked? Please review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 20:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the COI policy again and have no intention of making further edits to the page at this time. Theahl (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. So what do you want to edit about? 331dot (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to edit anything currently. I would like to change my user name so I am in compliance with the site's guidelines and I would like to be unblocked so that I can contribute in the future if I so desire. Theahl (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jchaimo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to again request an unblock so I may resume editing. My username has been changed to comply with the site rules, and I will ensure that editing guidelines and regulations are followed moving forward.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You still haven't told us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2020

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jchaimo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request an unblock so I may resume editing. Specifically, I am currently interested in editing the page Virginia Wings in order to provide some additional information and clarity on the topic. Thank you.

Decline reason:

No. No, no, no. WP:COI. Didn't you read it? You claimed you understood and wouldn't make further edits in violation of WP:COI but now claim to want to edit pages for which you have a conflict of interest. No. Yamla (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla I have read the WP:COI. Can you please advise then how I can make or suggest edits to pages where I have a perceived COI? It does not appear that I can use the Request Edit tool while I am blocked. The page in question has factual inaccuracies that I can help clean up. Thank you.