User talk:Jackmiami

Hello, Jackmiami, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian - I know I do. Remember that the encyclopedia is only as good as its members make it, and that your opinion and contributions are fully as important as anyone else's. Be bold!

If you need help, feel free to check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page (your talk page) and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. To make discussion easier, it is important that you remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking the signature button on the toolbar. This will automatically fill in your username and the date.

Welcome once again, and good luck with your future edits. —INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 01:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to join Wikiproject Miami and create a user page. Thanks for your contributions to all the transit articles in South Florida. Arigont 00:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on One Miami, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SkierRMH 06:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mellon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask again: I couldn't help but notice that this copyrighted stock photo [1] looks extremely similar to [[Image:Newworldtower.jpg which you claim to have taken yourself. Can we assume all of you other uploads are of a similar source, and do we have to verify each of them individually? ccwaters 15:26, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marquisdrawing.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mosmof 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hotelmiamiinr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 18:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mosmof 05:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted two images you uploaded as copyright violations. Unless you can authenticate that you took the photos and that they are not copyright violations, I will be deleting the others as well. Also, please do not delete copyright violations on images. These are added to images to highlight problems and simply deleting them without addressing the issue is incorrect. --Sue Anne 05:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Loft2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Mellon.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.emporis.com/en/il/im/?id=299594. As a copyright violation, Image:Mellon.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Mellon.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk:Image:Mellon.jpg]]. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Mellon.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mosmof 00:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users. Thank you. ccwaters 03:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jackmiami for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Mosmof 05:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InterContinental Miami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InterContinental Miami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]