User talk:JRice4president

A tag has been placed on Lex Rofes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Lex Rofes is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Lex Rofes. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Irongargoyle 02:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Your user page is: User:JRice4president. utcursch | talk 03:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George W. Bush, you will be blocked from editing. Bsherr 23:50, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Black people, you will be blocked from editing. Photouploaded (talk) 22:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Benoit Pausader requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Vejvančický (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]