User talk:Iran nuclear weapons

For reasons which should be obvious, I do not want this account to be connected to me.Iran nuclear weapons (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not obvious, mainly because I have no idea who you are. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My contributions should now make it obvious. I am well aware of the sockpuppet policy and will follow it.Iran nuclear weapons (talk) 11:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still not obvious to me. But it is important to appreciate that we do not care who you are, so long as your contributions accord with our policies; which they clearly do.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I assume you know, multiple accounts are allowed in Wikipedia. But please be careful not to abuse this facility, as sockpuppetry leads to blocking. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Iran nuclear weapons, thanks for creating Nuclear concessions to Iran!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 23:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to note for posterity that I have been quite clear from the get-go that this was an alternate account. [1] (it would have been immediately obvious to anyone that this and iran nuclear weapons 2 were the same person.) As one can see from the diff, Wikipedia admin was initially accepting of the alternate, but at the end obviously not. From the discussion on the talk page of User:Iran nuclear weapons 2, it seems that the intent of this block is to disallow the alternate account, but that Wikipedia is fine with me continuing to edit. I will abide by that. In return, I request that Wikipedia abide by my request not to try to connect the accounts. Thanks. Iran nuclear weapons (talk) 19:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please copy the above "about this account" discussion, verbatim, to my SPI, located at the link below. Additionally, please copy my user page, verbatim, there. Lastly, please note there User:Ankhsoprah2, at whose behest the SPI appears to have been started [2], is a textbook example of why one might want privacy. [3], and was aware of my request for privacy [4], but both that user and the admins have apparently chosen to disregard it. Thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Iran_nuclear_weapons_2.

I've made a note of it. --I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 21:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]