User talk:I dream of horses/2014/July

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I got your messages about the editing of our HomeAid entry in Wikipedia. We are a non-profit organization that builds housing across the country for homeless organizations. We are attempting to add content to our Wiki page so people can learn about us and visit our website if interested in helping with the cause. I am very confused by your messages telling me to stop "soap boxing and promoting". We are trying just to inform. It is hard to do that without telling people what you do. Please advise me on how to proceed.

Thank you, Peter Simons CEO HomeAid America — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.9.215 (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Horses--can you please respond to my question above? We want to improve our Wiki page and need to know the guidelines. I thought the changes we made were fairly objective and we--as a non-profit--are not trying to sell anything. Please advise ASAP. Thank you, Peter Simons — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.9.215 (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I disagree. I don't think the edits were objective. It seemed like you were trying to advertise the organization, instead of rephrasing information from reliable sources in your words. A relevant guideline would be the conflict of interest guidelines. --I dream of horses (T) @ 17:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I dream of horses. I am sorry I accidentally deleted some information about Dinosaurs Alive!. I was just editing something then my fingers duoble touched my mouse which highlighted some of the article then I accidentally preesed 'hbekhebdk...etc. then I deleted what I accidentally (so much for words hehehe) wrote o the page. I tried to put it back but i can't remember and it takes so much work and I'm tired ( just went to work an hour ago ). Anyways, I already went in Dinosaurs Alive! and enjoyed it so much and saw some info are wrong and am trying to correct some. I hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanA32 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 1 July 2014‎ (UTC)

I don't see any edits on the page since May of this year. I dream of horses (T) @ 17:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh, wait, I see the page you're talking about. Since you didn't do it repeatedly, I'll take it that it was a mistake. I dream of horses (T) @ 17:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I see you have reverted my edit to this brand new redirect.

This is a new "meme" and actually refers to Clitoris, not to football player, Arjen Robben.

Honestly it's not very noteworthy and should probably be deleted, but if it stays up, it should redirect to the correct page.

I'll fix it now.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.186.240.203 (talk) 02:40, 2 July 2014

Soory dear its a mistake i am realy very sorry for that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vsonu79 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

It is very important to know who killed him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.19.99.124 (talk) 19:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

You made a mistake in restoring the old All-American Conference alignment for the 2013-2014 school year. I deleted it because it is past July 1st, the day that high school conference realignments take place. All I was doing was replacing the old out of date alignment for the All-American Conference with the new one for the 2014-2015 school year, which took effect on July 1st, 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.228.32.175 (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

this is so confusing, I sent in two article drafts for review per your instructions (DAN.DNA.LIVE (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC))

Greetings to you IDOH,

I was just wondering at what point I'll become a confirmed user so that I can begin to place a photo on a page.

Also, what evidence do I need that I have the copyright holder's permission to place the photo?

Yours,

The Brain Coach

--58.173.133.112 (talk) 03:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

If you register/log into your own account, you'll be autoconfirmed after four days and ten edits, at which point you'll be able to log into Wikimedia Commons. Barring the photo being someplace online with a copyright to someone else, I think we mostly take people at their word as to who the copyright holder is. --I dream of horses (T) @ 05:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey. I removed it because it was repeated information, adding nothing new to the page. I think a "Production" section would be better explored should it contain more information. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.100.244.111 (talk) 06:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

The G5 CLASSIFIEDS™ link shared is 100% appropriate and relevant to the wikipedia Social Classifieds? Social Classifieds is exactly what it is!!! Is it not? I mean why would the link shared be considered spam but Oodle, Facebook Marketplace, Classonet etc. is NOT spam?? Now how is that possible? Something just isn't adding up? Do they pay or just receive some sort of special privilege or something? I'm only sharing similar info relevant to what I see already shared to the page and actually I believe the info I updated to the page is more relevant? It's 100% free unlike some of the other sites listed on the page, so you are basically telling me that you are okay with referring people to sites that persuade people to pay money for there service and and not okay with people being referred to G5 CLASSIFIEDS™ which is 100% free! I am not a part of G5's staff, I am only a member satisfied with the free service they provide and I only made an edit to a wikipedia page where I found the site to be absolutely relevant!!! What's the problem??? Because I am boggled here??? What if it wasn't a clickable link at all or does it even matter? I sense a bit of favoritism going on here??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.49.183.14 (talk) 01:20, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Don't you think that the fact that you have been blocked once, a couple of months ago, for repeatedly adding the link to Wikipedia articles serves as a strong indivation that it is in fact an inappropriate link to add? Four different editors, five if you include the administrator who blocked you, have informed you that it is inappropriate. And yes, the link to Classonet.com was also inappropriate, and has been removed. And no, it would not matter if it were not clickable. --bonadea contributions talk 09:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

I will rename account, apologies — Preceding unsigned comment added by SMART Collaboration (talk • contribs) 19:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Emily, I recently added an article that, I trust will inspire a range of energetic responses. It's an original idea, ideally suited for Wikipedia. I greatly value open discussion of dissenting views. I have been an observer and participant in what's now being called The Sharing Economy for years. I am not an academic. I earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Economics after serving in the US Navy for 4 years & working for Greenpeace (part-time) for nearly 3 years. I work professionally on environmental services for the Oil Industry. I'm both a member of the ACLU and a supporter of the National Rifle Association. I've donated, and will continue to financially support Wikipedia, though I am concerned about Wikipedia's openness to ideas counter to accepted orthodoxy.

I'd appreciate knowing more about you, and how you came to judge & delete the GunShare Article I posted so quickly. I'd appreciate any advice you could offer on how I may improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayberryonMushrooms (talk • contribs) 21:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I didn't delete the article you created. I just nominated it for deletion--speedy deletion, at that. There is a pretty significant difference.

I nominated it for deletion because I felt it was more suited for a pamphlet, or even an ad, and not an encyclopedia article. I'm sure the administrator who actually did delete the article, Peridon, will be able to explain further. --I dream of horses (T) @ 01:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

OK. I did delete it, and I stand by my decision. To start with, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. It isn't social media or a free web host. Its function is not to "to initiate research" on anything. That can be viewed as promoting discussion or promoting an idea WP:SPAM and WP:NOBLE. We don't even publish original research WP:OR. To be recorded here, things have to be discussed in reliable independent sources WP:RS - not the person doing the thing or putting the idea forward, or their associates, but totally independent and reliable sources. Not blogs (with a very few exceptions), forums, wikis, books by people involved, or any form of free webhost like blogspot and weebly, or social media like Facebook etc. If there were an existing (not proposed, but actually running) outfit doing this gunshare, and it were able to pass WP:GROUP or other subsidiary to WP:GNG with referencing to WP:RS level sources, then a neutrally worded article would be possible. As this appears to be a piece of 'original research' (which includes original thought...), it is not suitable for an article. The wording of the article was very promotional of the idea, and that was the reason for the actual speedy deletion. Otherwise, it would have been nominated for deletion at WP:PROD, or taken to Articles for deletion WP:AFD, as being OR is not a speedy deletion criterion. Please feel free to ask questions, and please sign talk page posts with ~~~~ which puts your sig on with a datestamp, like this: Peridon (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

As to "openness to ideas counter to accepted orthodoxy" here, we do record record things that are counter to orthodoxy so long as they are demonstrably notable. Homeopathy is notable, despite it being logically and scientifically indefensible - so are Reich's orgone boxes. A lot of fringe stuff, however, is not notable, despite the amount of self-generated publicity that some of it enjoys. BTW I would advise you to read WP:COI as I see you state that you are a member of the NRA. Peridon (talk) 08:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Integrity Engineering Article has been hijacked it now links to www.oilandgasfundamentals.com please remove. This is a technical article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.162.57.143 (talk) 22:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I have never heard of Gordon Korman. I did not edit his article. Perhaps I have been spoofed. Thank you for correcting it. Regards, Chefwannabe (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps you weren't logged in, and are on an IP that's either dynamic (that is, it reassigns itself so often), or shared with other people? --I dream of horses (T) @ 17:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The links are to YouTube videos that contribute history from the neighborhood/ community perspective about these Chicago neighborhoods. They were created by community groups and community development corporations in the neighborhoods under a grant from the MacArthur Foundation. Hope this helps and I hope you will decide to include these informative videos. I also received a bot message that the links were being removed. This seems a very complex system here so I hope I am leaving a note in the right place. Sally Duros - user saduros Saduros (talk) 23:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

For the most part, it really isn't appropriate to add social media links to articles. I'm defining social media as YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. There are, of course, exceptions to this rule, but it's still a good rule to abide by. --I dream of horses (T) @ 00:31, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Why erased editing? --Movers2008 (talk) 04:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Because you seemed to erase a large chunk of information while you were editing. --I dream of horses (T) @ 04:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Apologies. It was an attempt to edit the result tables as the full details were being obscured by poor formatting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panhead2014 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh, yes, formatting can be hard to figure out. --I dream of horses (T) @ 22:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I see you recently reverted an edit by User:115.132.90.27 where they removed a section from Racism in the United Kingdom. While an edit summary would have been nice, I believe the edit is pretty much justified, that section is far too lengthy and was only added today by an editor who appears to only be here to promote own name/work on various Wikipedia articles. I issued a COI warning, but it doesn't appear to have been heeded and I don't have time to go throughout the various additions either. Perhaps you could take a look at what's going on and also maybe consider reverting your edit (or at least trimming the section significantly). Thanks.--Shakehandsman (talk) 05:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

The anon seems to have reverted my revert already, but thanks for the heads up. --I dream of horses (T) @ 06:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for your diligence. It is appreciated. "The Legend of Ivan Tors" is an educational documentary about the creator and producer of every single episode of Science Fiction Theater. Anyone, anywhere, anytime that is interested in Science Fiction Theater will be interested in the history of the show and its creator.

Thank you.

c — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campfirenetwork (talk • contribs) 01:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I dream of horses!! Thanks for your help. For sure I'm trying to do my best as an editor, It's just a little bit different to the different codes that I already know. I'm not sure where are the right tools, but I know I can do it. At this time I'm working on a friends page, but the hard part is the references. That's the thing that s bugging me, I've been looking all over the internet and Wikipedia, I editing the original text because I don't want to present any info without proper references. I dont want my page erased. Could you please consider in adopting me? I'll behave =) I'm a Journalist, and yes, and excited about the things we have to fix. I'm not sure if I'm using the talk back the right way, I;ll find it soon. Rcarrillo67 (talk) 02:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Why did you even bother to review Payner94 with a sarcastic statement, when it is obvious vandalism? I am just curious. Piguy101 (talk) 02:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't see how "Please take Wikipedia seriously" is sarcasm when it's pretty obvious that somebody isn't taking Wikipedia seriously.

I mostly reviewed for technical reasons--to remove it from the new pages feed. Also, even though the chances that they'll stop vandalizing because of that comment, it isn't entirely nothing. --I dream of horses (T) @ 04:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

The comment wasn't sarcastic; I just couldn't think of a better word at the moment. I did not realize that doing so would remove the article from the feed. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Ah, well. In my time zone, it was late at night. Was it the same in your time zone? --I dream of horses (T) @ 01:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Yep Piguy101 (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Deaf culture. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Been using Wikipedia for years, finally decided I should start contributing. Thanks for your welcome note helping me get started

GlennLawyer (talk) 16:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

No problem. :-) --I dream of horses (T) @ 05:38, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

you restored some information i removed from Zamalek SC article , the reason I removed it is because it is in Zamalek's 2013-14 season page and don't belong to the main article — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshrafFahim96 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

The season page doesn't seem to exist. --I dream of horses (T) @ 03:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Zeus (or WTF gods they have) forbid we make fun of pro wrestling!

Take a look at all the topics of some significance that don't have a Wikipedia article yet, and tell me you just made good use of your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.101.14 (talk) 03:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, You removed a link that I included at the Kodak 35RF page. I reviewed the policy page and I do believe that the link which I provided is a perfect example of the approved use of external links, and very consistent with how I have seen such links used effectively throughout WP.

Policy quoted: Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia (external links), but they should not normally be placed in the body of an article. All external links must conform to certain formatting restrictions.

Some acceptable links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.

I believe that this collection of Kodak cameras adds an extra depth of knowledge not viable in the WP format, and was properly included outside of the body of the article and is specifically on-topic. Your objection was vague suggesting that the inclusion was not consistent with an encyclopedia. That comment seems wholly inconsistent with ongoing practices at WP. This type of inclusion allows WP readers to benefit from copyrighted material on other sites without the effort of getting owners of intellectual property to give the unlimited free use permission required by WP policy.

Best regards.76.103.33.70 (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

I was a bit concerned since it was a private collection; however, I am not going to remove it again. --I dream of horses (T) @ 00:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding on this. WP works well when we all work together and grow. I was very active years ago and in on developing key rule sets, actually limiting/managing the sensible growth of rule sets. And also worked a lot in dispute resolution and protecting article from deletion. I got burned out and now just do spot editing discreetly. I became politicized because I was upset that WP had developed an overly protective infrastructure and bureaucracy. Many of us who wrote a lot of articles battled fiercely with policy-wonks on power trips. That being said, we need dedicated people "on the wall" defending the project from spam, vandals, and misinformation. This is so critical to the credibility of the project. Keep up your spirits and energy. 76.103.33.70 (talk) 06:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi1 Now that I have done my editing of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Isidro_A._T._Savillo, how do I create an article out of it? Towering peaks (talk) 22:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Firstly, I want you to look at this page on how to do inline citations, because there seems to be several inline citations that are used more than once. There's a "trick" to where you can maybe assign those inline citations the same number. Then, you'll probably want to look at this page on using too many inline citations, because, frankly, I find your article nearly unreadable.

After you take in the advice and adjust the draft accordingly, you'll want to put {{subst:submit}} at the top of the page, and wait around a month. --I dream of horses (T) @ 22:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll look into that. Towering peaks (talk) 23:07, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi I dream of horses. I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing. Yes, I am the author of Timeless Toys, but how can I correct errors on the page that I know to be errors, without citing a reference. Is that allowed? I don't really care if my book is listed, but I thought it had to be. Can you help clue me in?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Timelesstim (talk • contribs) 17:34, July 19, 2014‎ (UTC)

In this case, per our conflict of interest guidelines, it's probably most ethical to leave the reference on the talk page of the article, under a {{requested edit}} tag. --I dream of horses (T) @ 22:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm totally lost and not sure how to do what you're saying, so I will not add my book to the reference section. My intention was to correct some falsehoods, not promote my book. Thanks for your help. I am clearly not a html pro or a programmer, so thanks for help point me in the right direction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timelesstim (talk • contribs) 18:19, July 19, 2014

I deleted information that jeopardizes current FAMs. The person re-entering the information is currently being investigated. Please do not re-add the information. If you are affiliated, you too will be investigated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.18.226 (talk) 01:06, July 23, 2014‎ (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Legal threat by 76.14.18.226 Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for reading my edit on the topic of Radalas in Kandyan Kingdom. However I think that was mistake to remove my edit as this article is written in accordance to a site called www.karava.org which is a site that provide false information about the history and lineages of Sri Lankan families and hence it's written from a biased view point. The article is not neutral with false facts and I made some amendments to make it more neutral. For example, some families of nobles can easily trace their lineages to King Senarath who ruled before the Nayakkars and their caste is govigama up to date. Although caste system is a lowly practice as human beings, the history of a country and a kingdom is very important as well. Therefore I hope you will not remove my edit again. Thank you. I hope you could investigate in to this information and I'm glad to give you a few sites where you can trace the family lineages of many Kandyan families. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lasitha1986 (talk • contribs) 01:43, July 23, 2014‎

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:In the news. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

The page I edited had actual information a few months back then someone deleted all the data and put just his/her company's profile (eSewa) in the list of e-commerce which is not an e-commerce at all.

I want to remake the page by removing all the previous references since the references quoted are baseless and has no actual reflection of current status of e-commerce in Nepal.

I am a co-auther of a 3 credit University research on E-commerce in Nepal and have the most current data to put in this topic. I hope you can understand and cooperate so I can put this page to the right direction and add authentic and current data.

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timsinakiran (talk • contribs) 05:40, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

You could simply readd the references taken away a few months ago BEFORE you take away the references currently there. That might be a bit better. --I dream of horses (T) @ 05:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi i dream of horses,

I am Nikhil a new writer. I had like to contribute Indian names to major fishes and other living organisms like plants and animals to all articles. This can bring in more Indian readers and preserve the ancient names forever.

Can you adopt me?

Thank you for the message. I shall try maximum to contribute more articles as I am a technical writer or content writer.

http://technizine.com/

Nikhil Sukumar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhil.technizine (talk • contribs) 05:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't adopt users, but here is a program for "adopters" and their "adoptees". --I dream of horses (T) @ 06:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Moved barnstar here.

Thanks! --I dream of horses (T) @ 23:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

What gives you the right to remove a change to the page of the town i love and live in for 13 years??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadow Anon Z (talk • contribs) 00:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Well, the fact you tried to pass off a corporation as a person didn't help at all. That, and all because you live there doesn't mean that you own the article about it. --I dream of horses (T) @ 00:09, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Mr. I Dream Horse,

You removed a change i had made to the page of my home town for 13 years now. what gives you the right and ability to govern what happens on that page?

Shadow_Anon_Z — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadow Anon Z (talk • contribs) 19:10, July 25, 2014

1. Please read what I've said above.
2. I am a young woman. Please call me "Ms.". --I dream of horses (T) @ 00:12, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

You made a big mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Therealdeal1234567 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Moved from user:I dream of horses Jim1138 (talk) 08:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC) The issues regarding deletion of Current news of india page have been fixed permanently. Now it need not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julia.july (talk • contribs) 02:53, July 26, 2014‎

Unfortunately, it was still deleted per the discussion that took place. --I dream of horses (T) @ 21:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. Too bad you changed the right information I gave about Frances Bean Cobain. Frances is not an American visual artist. She says so about herself but she isn't. She is known only as daughter of Kurt and Courtney. Where do you get she is an American visual artist? She only made a few drawings. I wanted to set that right.

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesbeancobain (talk • contribs) 22:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

She is notable because she is an artist--if she isn't, she doesn't get to have her own article.

Oh, and since you aren't Frances, you'll have to change your username shortly to continue editing unblocked. --I dream of horses (T) @ 22:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. Too bad you changed the right information I gave about Frances Bean Cobain. Frances is not an American visual artist. She says so about herself but she isn't. She is known only as daughter of Kurt and Courtney. Where do you get she is an American visual artist? She only made a few drawings. I wanted to set that right.

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesbeancobain (talk • contribs) 22:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

She is notable because she is an artist--if she isn't, she doesn't get to have her own article. Oh, and since you aren't Frances, you'll have to change your username shortly to continue editing unblocked. --I dream of horses (T) @ 22:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

I asked you where did you get she is an artist? Can you answer that question for me? Bet you can't. Because she is not an artist. Oh, and she gets to have her own article because she is famous offspring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesbeancobain (talk • contribs) 22:45, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Moved cookie here on 19:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

I am immeasurably disappointed by the haste of your deletion of my edits, you will find that all my attributions were sourced. I would like to be informed of a reason detailing why my altering's of the particular article have been faced such scrutiny and rejection if ,as I would contest they're validity is provable ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterJosephs (talk • contribs) 20:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. Too bad you changed the right information I gave about Frances Bean Cobain. Frances is not an American visual artist. She says so about herself but she isn't. She is known only as daughter of Kurt and Courtney. Where do you get she is an American visual artist? She only made a few drawings. I wanted to set that right.

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesbeancobain (talk • contribs) 22:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

She is notable because she is an artist--if she isn't, she doesn't get to have her own article. Oh, and since you aren't Frances, you'll have to change your username shortly to continue editing unblocked. --I dream of horses (T) @ 22:41, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

I asked you where did you get she is an artist? Can you answer that question for me? Bet you can't. Because she is not an artist. Oh, and she gets to have her own article because she is famous offspring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesbeancobain (talk • contribs) 22:45, 26 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesbeancobain (talk • contribs)

thanks for the clarification, in the future I will take these into account. nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.97.87.136 (talk) 07:23, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

hello Horses regarding my user name - I am the Event Manager for Club Laverda Qld Concours and the Club Laverda Editor regarding the external link - I would like the part about 2014 being the 26th event hosted by Club Laverda Qld left in if possible the web address can go Bryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClubLaverdaEditor (talk • contribs) 07:37, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

thanks for the clarification sir--Dr. ashok shukla (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer of help, I'm just casually using it at the moment. But if I have any questions I'll shoot them your way. Thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob8662 (talk • contribs) 03:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi I_dream_of_horses, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle ^connect!

Major changes:

• Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
• Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
• Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far

In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Who do you think you are to decide if someone 'famous' is an artist or not? How do you get to your sources and what are your sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancesClarification (talk • contribs) 15:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks bro, I was so bored and I was surprised nobody had made it yet, so * just said might as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay2020 (talk • contribs) 00:04, July 31, 2014‎

That's the spirit of Wikipedia. --I dream of horses (T) @ 05:33, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, The information previously listed is incorrect. It is simply greater detail of the brands history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaomiRheinberger (talk • contribs) 01:03, July 31, 2014‎

Actually, what you put in read like an advertisement instead of enclycopedically, and that's why I reverted it. --I dream of horses (T) @ 06:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC) (edited at 06:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC))

I'm wondering if we're being a bit harsh. I deleted User:Dahua Security and User:Ceci Wang -- both the company article, then cautioned her about promoting. Now she's made Dahua Technology. I see only press releases, but there are maybe some good refs out there. She isn't sourcing, and even if she did, the thing would likely fail the general notability guidelines for organizations.

Have I been a bit harsh with my promo deletions lately? I may need a reality check with my my actions to see if I'm straying from right decisions. Feedback? Stalker feedback would be welcome too. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Maybe it's best to AfD it if it doesn't get improved over the next few days. --I dream of horses (T) @ 07:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

It's a tough one. I guess we have to tag based on the article alone, and not the editor's past. Tricky, because this is the third time she's pushed for this article. First was a userpage copyvio. Second was a new username with the article there. This time, however, it seems to have some legitimacy, although it could fail AfD, at least it has a chance. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, it has a chance. Let's give it that chance. --I dream of horses (T) @ 07:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Who do you think you are to decide if someone 'famous' is an artist or not? How do you get to your sources and what are your sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancesClarification (talk • contribs) 15:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

'July 2014[edit] Information icon Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:I dream of horses that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}. message on my talk page. @ 02:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)'

"If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you"

Thanks for your message, so I do have a question, it goes:

Could you maybe answer the question I ask you about the incorrect information you claimed to post on the wikipedia page of this offspring? I just asked: How do you get to your sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancesClarification (talk • contribs) 16:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)