User talk:ICMurray

Welcome!

Hello, ICMurray, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. I removed the "wikify" tag. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To add an infobox, the easiest thing is to go to an article that has one. Click "edit" so you can see the source and copy and paste the infobox into the new article. Then change all the information.

As far as a picture, they're easy to put in articles, but if the picture isn't uploaded, that's more complicated. I've never uploaded an image before. Wikipedia:Uploading images is the page about that, although if you've already looked there, I don't know what to tell you. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

crossposted from User talk:NickelShoe

Hello again. Thank you for your help. You are truly fantastic. Next question- How do I space the titles within my article evenly? Some are double spaced...Others single. Regards, ICMurray May 30, 2007 ICMurray 21:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too. Knowledge of the formatting and stuff just comes with practice. Everyone was new once.

I think you mean how there's extra space after the intro paragraph, the product line paragraph, and the craftmanship paragraph? You've just got extra lines in there. Just edit the section that has the extra space at the end to where there's only one blank line in the edit box. NickelShoe (Talk) 22:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm a little busy right now, but if you want to look over WP:FOOTNOTE that might help. I'll take a look at the article tomorrow and see if I can help (if you still need it). NickelShoe (Talk) 03:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I looked at the article. You don't actually have to use footnotes if you don't want, as long as you cite it somehow. If you do want to use footnotes, just put <ref>Citation information here</ref> and then at the end of the article type <references />. If you're using footnotes with block quotes, I'd put her name first, then the complete citation information including her name inside the ref tags. Otherwise it looks kind of weird.

Do you have sources other than Deluna herself? I took out the unref tag, but replaced it with one requesting third-party sources. NickelShoe (Talk) 11:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well you really need sources. You do seem to have a lot of quotes from her, so you might trim them down to the most important ones. But I wouldn't take out your only sources. I'd concentrate on adding sources. Don't worry too much about having a tag on the article. Click "random article" half a dozen times and you'll run into some others. The more important thing is making the article as good as possible. NickelShoe (Talk) 02:24, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have some quotes from other sources, the tag isn't really appropriate, so I removed it. Good work. NickelShoe (Talk) 13:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Marisol Deluna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Msnicki (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marisol Deluna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marisol Deluna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElizabethCB123. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]