User talk:Hornsmill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Hornsmill, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Horns Mill, Hertford has been reverted.
Your edit here to Horns Mill, Hertford was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/hornsmill) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Bengeo and Horns Mill articles

I have again reverted your additions about "notable people" in the Bengeo article. You need to provide reliable sources that show that these people actually lived in Bengeo - as far as I can see, the links that you provided do not support this claim. And at least one of your items is obviously total nonsense.

I have also reverted most of the nonsense that you added to Horns Mill, Hertford. Random information about where young people gather is not encyclopaedic and does not belong in Wikipedia. Gandalf61 (talk) 16:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hornsmill, I have added a comment to the talk page of the above article with some suggestions about how to progress the addition of people with connections with Bengeo, Regards Tmol42 (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

Hi Hornsmill, I spent a bit of time the other day sorting out the formatting of a number of the sources you had recently added to articles on Hertfortshire settlements. I had hoped this might have encouraged you to take a bit more care about ensuring citations you add meet Wikipedia requirements, however I see you are still adding links to urls in the same way. Basiscally, just adding what are called "inline links" in the form of a url bracketed with the ref tags does not meet Wp requirements. Please could you take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources which is a very helpful guide, which also provides links to other useful pages with examples templates etc. I hope having looked at this you will revisit the pages you have edited over recent days and adjust the citations you have added to these articles. If you need further help do drop me a line. Cheers. Tmol42 (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've updated references for Hertingfordbury and Sacombe. Is that better? Ta.

A big improvement. One important bit to get them up to WP standard though Is to put a pair of square brackets [ ] around the URL and the description of the URL or article heading, author etc. This hides the URL and highlights the text. Then add , Accessed ddmmyyyy after the brackets. This makes the cite much neater on the page and clearer to the reader. Btw I will move you Rp on my page here to make since of this exchange as its lost on my talk page. Tmol42 (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thomas Dimsdale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

mabdul (public) 08:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kenneth Burslam Gardner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-kenneth-gardner-1617725.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Captain Calm (talk) 01:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]