User talk:HolaHersh

Hello, HolaHersh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 07:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nikolaus von Habsburg-Lothringen has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bweebly\.com\b (links: http://vonhabsburg.weebly.com/), http://vonhabsburg.weebly.com/)).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{tn|adminhelp}

I'm afraid I don't understand whats still wrong with this article. Could you please explain in PLAIN english why this article has flags on it?

I will look into it, and reply here soon. For future note, please add comments at the end of the page, indented with a colon, and please sign every post with ~~~~. Thanks. --  Chzz  ►  01:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The tags are put there to help improve the article, so don't worry about them.

The first problem is with references. Although they are listed at the bottom, it's not possible to see which facts in the article came from which source. For help on how to improve this, have a look at User:Chzz/refs.

The second problem is the overall layout.

• All articles should start off with the name of the article in bold; I've made that change, please see this edit.
• There are no wikilinks in the article. You make a wikilink by finding the name of the other article, and using [[this format]] to make the link. I've added a couple with this edit to show you what I mean. See Wikipedia:Linking for more info.

The article had lots of <p> in it, to separate paragraphs; these are not needed in wikipedia, and so should be removed.

I hope that this is clear; if you have any further questions, please ask again. Please, though, do not use the {{adminhelp}} unless you really need an administrator. The ordinary {{helpme}} will work just fine.

Good luck, --  Chzz  ►  01:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually, the issue is that the article appears to be a hoax. Please see below, and/or here for the deletion discussion. //roux   01:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Nikolaus von Habsburg-Lothringen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolaus von Habsburg-Lothringen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. roux   01:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the template on the article states, this article must not be blanked while the AFD discussion is ongoing. Please do not do it again.

In addition, what about Wikipedia policy is unclear? Hoaxes are not allowed. Consider this your only warning. Do it again and you will be blocked, permanently, from editing Wikipedia. //roux   14:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]