User talk:Hippiepooter
Welcome!
Hello, Hippiepooter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
January 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jeremy Bowen. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Rd232 talk 23:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Hippiepooter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The entry in Jeremy Bowen is clearly partisan. No mention is made that Jeremy Bowen is accused of anti-Israel bias. No mention is made that the complainants were alleging breach of impartiality (ie bias) *against Israel. RD232 and Baseball are clearly abusing their positions as administrators to suppress information on widespread and well-sourced allegations of anti-Israel bias against Jeremy bias because they share this bias. I trust I will not have to recruit other people opposed to anti-semitism - who are many - to ensure Wiki maintains a balanced entry on Mr Bowen.
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hippiepooter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
OK, You Wiki administrators are clearly members of the New Nazi Left trying to suppress information on the weight of criticism against Jeremy Bowen for being anti-Israel to make his bias that much more effective. You've got war.
Decline reason:
- gasp* How did you find out about our mass "Jeremy Bowen is great conspiracy"? we are all nazi's. Grow up Jac16888Talk 01:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hippiepooter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thank you for that hugely professional and measured response that completely fails to address my point that you suppress any mention of the huge number of well documented allegations against Jeremy Bowen for anti-Israel bias. The whole tone of your mention of the BBC Trust report is to minimise as far as possible the grudging findings that were reached. Your 'tweak' just shows what contempt you have for people's intelligence. Try not to get your fingers caught up in your swastika embroidered kafiya when replying
Decline reason:
That's quite enough. Talk page access revoked. –MuZemike 01:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Since you refer to my recent edit, I'll point out that the issue of how much WP:WEIGHT to give to this minor episode in Bowen's bio has been discussed before, and what you see was the measured outcome. See also this source which is in the article. (If you really wanted a more detailed discussion of the episode, you could look for articles relating to the BBC, anti-Israel bias and the like - but for WP:BLPs we have to treat minor episodes as, well, minor, and not go into every detail about its minorness and the disputes about the minorness.) Rd232 talk 01:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- (ec)You're right, even though I'd never even of Bowen before seeing this page, and have no idea of your dispute(I declined because you gave no valid reason to unblock), I am in fact a nazi. By the way, are you aware that your comment is so utterly moronic it didn't deserve a real answer. And also, by Godwins Law, this conversation is over, you lost. Go back to your little fantasies, and when your block expires, why not consider the slight possibility that maybe we're not part of a nazi left conspiracy--Jac16888Talk 01:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Wiki really should stop appointing 14 year olds to administer its pages. No, I’m sorry, there’s no reason for thinking that the New Left branch of the Hitler Youth is goosestepping through the pages of Wiki. .. Oh, hold on ... http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/critiques/new/Exposed_-_Anti-Israeli_Subversion_on_Wikipedia.asp .. Well whaddya, whaddya, whaddya!?
- I suggest you show some decorum and good faith and take the editing procedures laid down in WP:BRD to heart or you'll end up getting blocked again. GDallimore (Talk) 15:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
You Dalli show great decorum in covering up for anti-semitism. So block me Dalli. It wont be the end of the world for me. I shall continue to speak out against the wretchedness of bigots like you who covertly and overtly perpetuate anti-semitism. You've got as much good faith as Eichmann.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 20:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)