User talk:Heylee dooley/sandbox

Following the instructions of the peer review tutorial, I see her lead is written properly and summarizes the information in the article that is most important. I also think that the sections are organized well, I cannot see them being organized in another way because then it would be out of order I believe. Nothing seems off-topic and all the information I read is relevant. The literature referenced is balanced and neutral and it described as such in her edits on the page. There isn't any kind of persuasive writing that I can see, which is important not to have in a wikipedia article.MilkisWack1065 (talk) 03:22, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]