User talk:Herman Melon

I have nominated The Emily Post Institute, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Emily Post Institute. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Patton^t/c 19:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, just so you know, the article was a keeper. SMSpivey (talk) 08:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you do most of your work on Emily Post-related issues. I suspect that perhaps you are related to her or work for the The Emily Post Institute. When that article and the article for Elizabeth Post were up for deletion, I went through and added enough sources to save the articles from deletion, since the subjects are clearly notable. However, I have had to significantly alter and reduce some of the content you have put into the Emily Post Institute article. There were advertisement and point of view issues. If you have any questions about what I've done or what Wikipedia's policies are about articles, conflicts of interest, or content, drop me a line at my talk page! I hope you have a good day and continue contributing to Wikipedia! SMSpivey (talk) 09:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]