User talk:Grace Note

You said here that you'd never RfA, but please let me know if you ever change your mind. Your ideas on rotating power are interesting. -moritheil^Talk 05:38, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Har. Ceoil (talk) 18:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G-n; no, i was not laughing at you; intention was convey that you are too outspoken to pass a witch trial. Admin candidates cannot afford not to pull punches. Ceoil (talk) 20:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is that very quality of not being a politician which I think we should see more often. -moritheil^Talk 13:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By way of explination for my suddenly turning up; you made a very perceptive comment on your user page about a stalking horse a while back; during that badsites hullabloo. I watchlisted you page then (something I rarely do) and its been interesting following you since. I like reading bright people's musings, what can I say. Ceoil (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In light of your comments at Wikipedia talk:Neutrality enforcement and the views expressed on your user page, I am disappointed that you did not leap to the support of my proposal for parallel articles, suggested here and here and here.

The idea seems much in line with your views, but, of course, no one has supported it. --Ravpapa (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the history of the "Sam Blacketer" incident I noticed that you were among the very few who opposed his adminship. I just wanted to compliment everyone who did since all of you had either good instincts, good reasoning and weren't afraid of going against the grain. If you ever seek adminship then please let me know - we need more good admins. TheGoodLocust (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at more logs (no I'm not stalking you), and found that you opposed both William Connolley's adminship and Guettarda's. Initially I wasn't going to compliment you for the first one, but then I laughed out loud when I saw the second. At this point I think wikipedian's "requests for adminship" should begin and end with you, but hey, maybe I'm wrong and you are just a polemic. TheGoodLocust (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grace Note! I have replied to your comment at Talk:1948 Palestinian exodus from Lydda and Ramla#Images. Please have a look. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 12:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Grace Note, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User talk:Grace Note/Archive January-March 2006. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:22, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since your account has recently not been editing very regularly, on the page Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list you name has been moved to a list of editors who are willing to give assistance, but may not always be available. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. You are, of course, welcome to move yourself back to the other list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just ... O my. (It would be good if you would please date your essay. I -- and I presume others -- would better understand what you're saying if we knew that any particular essay were from, say, 2004, not last week.) GcT (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah but all edits are dated anyway and I don't care. I deleted most of it anyway. Don't fool yourself though. Looking around, I see it's still shit, particularly for women. But it's not worth fighting over. Grace Note (talk) 19:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grace Note. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grace Note. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Talk:MintPress News. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! To wit: Oh I didn't realise you people were controlling this. Tommy-Sizzle is obviously right but you've appointed yourselves arbiters so I guess this article will be one more that's dishonest and nothing anyone can do about it.Grace Note (talk) 03:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Doug Weller talk 07:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I get it. I didn't realise you were gatekeeping that page. There's no point bullying me. I don't give a fuck. Grace Note (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a week for spreading unpleasantness in this collaborative project. Probably you have been here long enough not to need any references to particular policies that these edits violate; I expect you've heard of them. I note the unpleasantness of your userpage too. Not sure why you bother to edit here at all? You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Didn't notice. Don't care. Have a nice day. Grace Note (talk) 03:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]