User talk:Gosox5555/Archive 1
Scooby Doo and the Snowmen Mystery LP
My name is Mistereks and I want to state that despite the fact that this LP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Scooby_Doo_and_the_snowmen_mystery is not notable (by you), it is in fact real and it is a Hanna Barbera product. True, it doesn't have the original actors voices, but nor has the animated Star Wars Clone Wars-series.
My point is this: you don't have to publish the article (maybe you could in another article about the record company Merry Go Round) BUT it would be nice to have some redress, because the discussion page ended with a comment that I was a kind of a liar (and then no more comments were allowed on that page!). The swedish actors were NOT famous when they recorded this LP, this was early in their careers, but I have never stated anything else.
Best regards Mistereks :-)
Link for the original LP: http://www.discogs.com/Mystery-Incorporated-Scooby-Doo-And-The-Snowmen-Mystery/release/1777154
Link for the swedish LP: http://www.discogs.com/Les-Baxter--Lenny-Adelson-Scooby-Doo-Och-De-Mystiska-Sn%C3%B6m%C3%A4nnen/release/610607
The swedish actors can also be found at www.imdb.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistereks (talk • contribs) 13:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
User:Jbomb321
My name is jbomb321 and you are trying to delete my call of duty seven article. yes there are alot of rumors but after i read your comment i cited my sources. I do point out that there are alot of facts as well. Some other guy also tried to destroy my article ost. can you please leave it alone. ther are some rumors but there are more facts. this is my first article and i would like it to stay. i went over it 10 times. Contact me somehow. Post a message. help me with the article, just dont delete it.
Speedy deletion declined: Christian Music Hall of Fame
Hello Gosox5555, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Christian Music Hall of Fame - a page you tagged - because: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Closedmouth (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- I just saw a warning from Gosox on Closedmouth's talk page and responded there... but since the discussion exists here as well, I'll ad a note here. Closdedmouth was completely right in removing the CSD tag. With the exception of the articles creator (and possibly major contributor) ANYBODY can remove CSD tags. You do not have to be an admin to do so. Additionally, you might want to review the essayWhy I hate speedy deleters.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 20:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, nevermind then! Gosox5555 (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- I looked into it a little more, but it was a recreation, just with a different name. If you are noming something for CSD via G4, it is best to include a link to the deletion discussion so that others can easily look it up (same goes for copyvios) by including a link others can see what discussion you are referencing, especially when there is a name change involved.---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 20:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, nevermind then! Gosox5555 (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Please Help!
Hi. Unfortunately the discussion hasn't been open for the standard seven days, so I'm afraid I can't close it just yet. I'll nonetheless keep an eye on it and re-evaluate once seven days have elapsed.
And thanks. :) Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 14:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Since you have placed your tags on this article, we have revised with advise from you and DGG. I was hopeful if you could review and advise if we revised to a point that you could remove your tags. If not, can you please offer some more guidance so that we can make this article meet the expectations of the community. I am new and am learning, but am very interested in maintaining standards and helping grow...Docbb1 (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
User:Nately120
Hi, you are trying to delete the article on the Coal Bin Bros. album "Barred For Life" citing that the band itself does not have a page. They do, as far as I can tell and it is located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_bin_bros I hope this helps, and thanks in advance. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nately120 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
RFB
Hi, I left a comment against your vote Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/Juliancolton#Support here and wondered if you would like to reply, regards (Off2riorob (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC))
Jacob khanis
Nice catch. I didn't notice that it was just an attack article lol. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 02:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
User:McCuddenn
Hi Gosox, you are trying to delete my I Can Make You a Man (reprise) page and I would like to know why. I am merely trying to complete the Rocky Horror navbox with all the songs having descriptions. Please remember what Wikipedia is about - people creating thier own global pedia and not others (such as yourself) trying to control that pedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by McCuddenn (talk • contribs) 02:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Request for feedback: -graphy
I noticed this article was actually a list (in fact, a glossary), so I've been doing some work on it.
I've renamed it to Glossary of graphies, have cleaned it up a bit, and have added it to Portal:Contents/List of glossaries.
I've posted my rationale to its AfD, where you voted to delete.
Please let me know at the AfD what else needs to be done to the article in order for it to be saved from deletion.
Thank you.
The Transhumanist 23:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 16:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)