User talk:Glasgowcat

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Scottish photographers, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.scottish-photographers.com/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your contribution to Scottish photographers, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from web sites or printed material without the express permission of the author or copyright holder. Lacking this, the copied content you added has been removed, rephrased or replaced by a boilerplate copyright template.

Although brief quotations are permitted in accordance with non-free content policy and guideline, please ensure that your contributions to Wikipedia are primarily written in your own words. If you believe that using language from a source is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License 3.0 (CC-BY-SA), then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at the talk page of the article and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the CC-BY-SA or compatible license or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page of the article with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material, you may either send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-By-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article, or place a note releasing the material as above at the external site. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

If you need any help, you can create a new section on your talk page and add {{helpme}} followed by your request below it, someone will be along shortly to assist you. Alternatively, you may also leave me a message on my talk page. Best regards, MLauba (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Neale Smith, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neale Smith. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Erpert (let's talk about it) 15:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cody Images is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cody Images until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Senator2029 “Talk” 15:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ted Nevill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref BLP. Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR, WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]