Search results
There is a page named "User talk:Gise-354x" on Wikipedia
- Welcome! Hello, Gise-354x, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages...27 KB (4,008 words) - 19:50, 26 February 2023
- now to re add the removed contends, the study is a legit contribution. Gise-354x (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC) Greenpeace is not a Reliable source...56 KB (7,676 words) - 09:26, 22 May 2022
- we add the funding section and clean it up a bit? What do you think? Gise-354x (talk) 02:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC) I agree that Exxon's funding is pertinent...86 KB (8,601 words) - 13:26, 17 April 2024
- and TinEye. — Jeff G. ツ 17:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC) Why you template Gise-354x with COI. Clearly a disruptive editor but I didn't get COI ducky from...60 KB (6,662 words) - 00:47, 3 March 2023
- Wikiquette alert, and perhaps reconsider it. In particular, look at User:Gise-354x's increasingly uncivil comments in his/her talk page when warned about...163 KB (17,102 words) - 20:30, 9 June 2024
- meatpuppets, not sockpuppets, so I'm not going to block just on that. Gise-354x was blocked for a week for edit warring, so the case in its current form...121 KB (16,101 words) - 11:02, 8 March 2023
- what you mean this link is "Promotional". But stop removing the link. Gise-354x (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC) Please see Template:Infobox album. Regards...39 KB (5,000 words) - 06:06, 27 February 2023
- org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yopienso Gise-354x (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC) I wondered that, too, Gise, but found notification of an SPI is not...97 KB (0 words) - 01:27, 5 March 2023
- link is "Promotional". Please explain to me why you removed the link Gise-354x (talk) 08:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC) Hello, Gioto! Sorry for my bad English...43 KB (5,408 words) - 18:31, 5 August 2021
- org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yopienso Gise-354x (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC) I wondered that, too, Gise, but found notification of an SPI is not...559 bytes (0 words) - 05:19, 28 July 2011
- Claiming Greenpeace is no longer a reliable source is wishful thinking. Gise-354x (talk) 01:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC) News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while...86 KB (10,796 words) - 23:04, 4 March 2023
- here or elsewhere but not at my talk page, thank you for cooperating. Gise-354x (talk) 02:29, 20 August 2011 (UTC) I think the user is working on it and...97 KB (14,262 words) - 06:01, 15 March 2023
- Thanks for the glass 'o hooch. "May a thousand camels spit upon the tents of your enemies" & cheers! — BQZip01 — talk 06:48, 1 January 2011 (UTC) You're...436 KB (58,878 words) - 16:09, 10 February 2024
- org/wiki/Talk:Global_warming_conspiracy_theory#Removing_of_Greenpeace_Study Gise-354x (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2011 (UTC) It should replace the other Greenpeace...350 KB (48,187 words) - 04:29, 16 December 2023
- I just came across this 3RR discussion that ended with you blocking Gise-354x (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user ·...1.11 MB (122,198 words) - 16:39, 19 June 2023