User talk:Gilletter

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Long range locator has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Long range locator constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 16:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Long range locator. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Metal detector. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mfield (talk) 01:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reverted several times, and have repeatedly deleted a page reference. Please cease doing that, as the scientific evidence is quite strongly against your position. (BTW, you wouldn't happen to be one Vincent Blanes, would you?) Haikupoet (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Me again. Please depart from long range locator and don't come back; not only have your additions been unsupported and of zero value, they're also in blatant violation of many Wikipedia guidelines, particularly WP:WEASEL, WP:SOAP, WP:V, and possibly WP:NOTADVERTISING. And on top of that you're a terrible writer to begin with. Haikupoet (talk) 23:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]