User talk:Ghatbh12

I reverted your edit because you used a DOI.org link. Don't use those. We want direct links only. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 20:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at C. & J. Clark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Star Mississippi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Stuart Machin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Star Mississippi 23:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:LondonerM&S per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LondonerM&S. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]