User talk:Geoboe84

Welcome!

Hello Geoboe84, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
  
• How to edit a page
  
• Help pages
  
• Tutorial
  
• How to write a great article
  
• What Wikipedia is not
  

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Fang Aili ^talk 13:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:North hall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geoboe84! I notice you've been updating quite a few figure skating articles. Thanks! Just one thing: would you mind using edit summaries? It helps people keep track of what's happening to the articles. And perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Figure Skating. We'd love to have you. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 13:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Fang Aili ^talk 14:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you did with the skating articles, almost. This edit seems much better than the current version. For people with color-blindness, the medals with lack of a number (first, second,) may not convey any information. Also, if there is a case where a skater only has bronze or bronze/silver medals, how do you know that the bronze medal is not gold (or vice/versa). What do you think? Neier 11:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geoboe84

I have put your comment regrading the medal tables here so others see it. But I am going to carry on changing them as discussed. The problem we have is with the images are that is decreases accessibility, and looks ugly.

Gary van der Merwe 08:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Geoboe. I don't know about deciding on a "universal" medal box, but there's a pretty strong concensus for non-medal images and years at the top. I agree that we should link the events, especially if they're not linked in the article. --Fang Aili ^talk 15:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm afraid Portal:Browse is only for listing completed portals. See Wikipedia:Portal for instructions on improving the portals, then once the figure skating portal is finished and polished, you can add it to the lists. Thanks. --Quiddity 21:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:PA-772.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

How about we take it to the project talk page for more input? --Fang Aili ^talk 17:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I noticed you shortened years down in Alissa Czisny and Beatrisa Liang's competitive highlights from four digits to two. Any specific reason? Kolindigo 20:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you are a memeber of the PA Highways wikiproject. Well I could use some help. I am currently working on expanding all the Pennsylvania state park articles. I have written articles on about 4 or 5, maye 6 state parks that are on Pennsylvania Route 233. Could you make an article for 233? It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you and have a Merry Christmas. Dincher 16:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for getting that done! It should clear quite a few red links for me. Dincher 14:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry if I came off a little abrupt on the edit summary for Benjamin Okolski (nats vs. junior nats). I should know better than to edit wikipedia when I've been having a bad day. Kolindigo 01:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Lysacek thing is why I've been cranky all day! I love both him and Weir, and I suck at dealing with the suspense. Kolindigo 01:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are using the Philippines Eagle Scout userbox. Are you aware that there is a userbox for BSA Eagle Scouts, too? {{User Eagle Scout}} --NThurston 20:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Weir was originally named to the team.[1] He dropped out, which is why he's not listen anymore on the ISU page. But at Nationals, he was originally on the team and Abbott was named as the alternate. Kolindigo 01:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1	10 February 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Notability of state highways is challenged Important deletion debates Featured subproject Featured member From the editor
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/N

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.  V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions} 20:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Jersey blank.svg The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 2	24 February 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Notability of state highways is upheld Deletion debates Kansas Turnpike is now a Good Article Featured subproject U.S. Roads IRC channel created Featured member Infoboxes and Navigation subproject started From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 20:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your part of WP:PASH and i'm gathering a team to help with Pennsylvania Route 65 and i would like it if you helped. Respond at Talk:Pennsylvania Route 65 Thanks. -- JohnnyAlbert10 ^{Time to talk · 17:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 3	10 March 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news Inactivity? Deletion debates Article Improvement Drive Featured subproject Good and Featured Articles Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Hello, Geoboe84. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 20:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 4	24 March 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news March 16 IRC Meeting Deletion debates Kentucky and Utah projects demoted Featured subproject A quick look at the structural integrity of state highway WikiProjects Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 22:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 5	5-8 April 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news Good and Featured Articles are promoted Deletion debates Interstate 238 revert war Featured subproject IRC discussion comes to light Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Apologies for the late delivery, TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 04:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 6	21 April 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project news Canada highway WikiProjects deleted Deletion debates Featured member From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 22:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 7	5 May 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news April 27 IRC meeting California Deletion debates MacArthur Maze Fire Illinois Featured member Circular route shields Pennsylvania From the editors
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 19:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 8	19 May 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news USRD members assist Canada project California Deletion debates Two debates at USRD Illinois Featured member A new GA Oklahoma From the editors Pennsylvania From the editors Washington
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 19:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 9	9 June 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news Highways notability guideline? California Deletion debates Portal debate Maryland Featured member Three new GAs From the editors Exit list debates
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 16:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter Issue 1 – June 16, 2007

Issue #1 The first issue of the WP:PASH newsletter recognizes all of the good articles the project has produced.

Project News After State Route 1002 (Lehigh County, Pennsylvania) was selected as the project featured article for June, it was listed as a Good Article. Thanks to everyone who helped the article. SR 1002 is the first quadrant route to reach GA status and the sixth article from PASH, with Interstate 95 in Pennsylvania, Schuylkill Expressway, Interstate 476, Pennsylvania Route 39, and Pennsylvania Route 145 being the other five. Interstate 476 is undergoing a peer review, a future featured article candidate. Feedback and ideas to improve the article are needed. Nominations for next month's featured article are needed. To-do list See User:Myselfalso/PA Routes for the status of PA Routes 1 to 100. Create articles for all routes and expand existing articles.

Featured Member The featured member of the month is Vishwin60. He has been an important member of the project for a long time and has writen the Pennsylvania Route 31 article. Thank you Vishwin, for helping out WP:PASH.

Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here.JA10^{Talk • Contribs} 19:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Pennsylvania State Highways Newsletter
Issue 2	1 July 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: Project News Parkway Closures Member News Safe 4th of July From the Editor Featured Article Introduction
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Comments Shortcut : WP:PASH/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. -- JA10 Talk • Contribs 02:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 10	7 July 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news Kentucky subproject promoted California Deletion debates AID restructuring Maryland Featured member GA status Pennsylvania From the editors Notability discussion currently collecting dust
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 04:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

• Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
• Join our mailing list
• Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 03:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear roads editor,

You may have noticed some changes at WP:USRD lately. Some of them, like the cleanup templates and the stub templates, have been astounding and great. Unfortunately, others have been disturbing.

This has become evidenced by the departure of a few prominent editors at USRD, a few RFC's, and much fighting among USRD editors.

After the second RFC, many of us found the opportunity to take a step away from Wikipedia for a while--as a self-imposed wikibreak, or possibly on vacation.

The result of such introspection was that many of us were placing ourselves in a "walled garden" and on a self-imposed pedestal of authority over the roads department. Also, we were being hostile to a few users who were not agreeing with us.

In fact, IRC has been the main incarnation of this "walled garden." Decisions have been made there to conduct grudges and prejudices against a few valued USRD users with poor justification.

For this, we have come to apologize. We have come to ask your forgiveness.

In addition to this, we hope to work as one USRD team from now on and to encourage cooperation instead of the promotion of interests.

All users are welcome to collaborate on IRC, the newsletter, or anywhere else at USRD.

In the future, please feel free to approach us about any issues you may have.

Regards,

• Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)
• TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats}
• master son^{T - C}
• Son^Talk
• (→O - RLY?)

Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 17:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 11	18 August 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State and national updates Project news Cleanup system revamped Assessment Deletion debates Stubs renamed New York Featured member IRC channel goes global From the editors Minnesota bridge collapses One year after SRNC: A reflection
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 21:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 12 • September 1, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features WikiProject template system revamped Inactivity report Stub template changes continue	State and national updates Missouri New Jersey New York Wisconsin
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 22:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 13 • September 15, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features U.S. road editors attempt to achieve the two millionth Wikipedia article WikiProject page revamped Bannered U.S. Routes merged Quality first: WikiWork, stubs, and improvement of the project	State and national updates New York
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 19:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geoboe84. We had a few urgent matters to communicate to you:

1. Please update your information at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Participants, our new centralized participant list. Those who have not done so by October 20th will be removed.
2. There are important discussions taking place at WT:USRD relating to whether WP:USRD, WP:HWY, or the state projects should hold the "power" in the roads projects.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 23:19, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 14 • September 30, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments Project news Deletion debates Featured member From the editors	Features Consolidation of participants list causes controversy Portal structure change Discussions regarding notability	State and national updates U.S. Routes New Jersey Pennsylvania New York State New York County Texas
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —O bot (t • c) 01:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been declared inactive at USRD. If this is in error, feel free to restore yourself to the list, but only if you are truly active at USRD. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geoboe84! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Yuri Ovchinnikov (figure skater) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2001 Finlandia Trophy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.skatecanada.ca/en/events_results/results/archives/2001/1finlandia.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geoboe84, (it could be my english i not always correct, it's not my dailly language -i'm dutch-, so i hope you excused me for faillures-) i noticed that the results (only the results) on this page you created, are te results of the 1969 edition. I guess you didn't noticed that till now. Maybe it's your wish to correct this. Friendly greetings, 86.85.150.20 (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC) (aka Pucky, the creater of the dutch version of the 1968 EFSC nl:Europese Kampioenschappen kunstschaatsen 1968)[reply]

By the way: (maybe you do know that yet already) the skatebase have a new webadress: [2]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1998 Ondrej Nepela Memorial, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www242.pair.com/amossman/JAYSON/RESULTS_MARKS/nepelu98.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you need two roads together in Template:jct in this way:

{{Jct|state=PA|US|6|PA|287}}

Add parameters when necessary.Mitch32^{(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.)} 16:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Over the last maybe year and a half, progress of article expansion at WP:PASH has slowed, and as a thought, I was wondering if you'd be interested in helping me and maybe some others start working on getting WP:PASH moving once again. Can you give me a hoot?Mitch32^{(We the people in order to form a more perfect union.)} 03:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I removed the junction list from U.S. Route 322 is that another editor said it was not necessary to include a state-specific junction list in an overview article. Once the U.S. Route 322 in Pennsylvania article is created, the junction list can be inserted there. However, creating that article is not of top priority right now as state-detail pages on routes are only needed if the main article becomes too long and we need to put priority into expanding existing articles. ---Dough4872 02:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sebestyenjurekszaras.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 23:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Details here: [3]. Yakushima (talk) 04:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Geoboe84. Have you considered applying for autoreviewer "status"? In case you don't know, basically what it means is that your newly created pages (and you've done more than a few!) get automatically marked as good and don't show up as needing human examination on Special:Newpages. You can actually apply for it yourself, but I reckon it's probably easier - probably loads of Wikipedia bureacracy involved - if I get the editor who granted me the rights to do so for you, too. I thought I'd ask you first if you were interested. Let me know if you have any questions... and keep up the good work! Cheers!--Technopat (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have submitted request. Cheers!--Technopat (talk) 05:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Shimgray | talk | 18:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use inline citations in your articles. Thanks. Ironholds (talk) 22:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mary Campbell (figure skater) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 01:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 1999 Sparkassen Cup, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 1999 Sparkassen Cup on Ice. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Just thought I'd let you know in case you didn't know about it. :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 20:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1993 Grand Prix International de Paris, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.girlcentric.com/Events/Competition.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1990 French Figure Skating Championships, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.freebase.com/feed/discuss/topic/en/1990_french_figure_skating_championships.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Geoboe84

Thankyou for bringing Owen Edwards competative highlights up to date. It appears that on September 25th you moved him from ice dancer to figure skater. I can confirm that he and his partner Louise Walden are in fact ice dancers. Because of the good work you have done on the competitive highlights I am reluctant to undo this error but ask if you wouldn't mind removing the figure skater tag.

Sincerely and in good faith Martin2Reid —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin2Reid (talk • contribs) 20:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Geoboe84

I read the page for Jeff Buttle today and noticed that you have merged his competition highlights into one table. I think the new one has a better format. However, I noticed that some of the competition results got mixed up and ended up in the wrong years. If you do not mind, could you please fix them?

Sincerely, Seameetsmountain (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you fixed them so quickly! Thanks a lot.

Seameetsmountain (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the figure skating bio result tables. I guess I have used a lot of them for the German Wikipedia. I'm glad you could use one of me too and that you also created an article for Horst Faber and maybe more.--Common Senser (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tamara Téglássy has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gigs (talk) 20:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:NavigationAustianChampionsFigureSkatingMen. Since you had some involvement with the Template:NavigationAustianChampionsFigureSkatingMen redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article County Route 28 (Schuyler County, New York) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable highway. No clear reason for notability established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mitch32^{(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?)} 02:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I know you're a USRD member however I have to warn you that except for certain cases, this level of county routes in New York are generally and 99% of the time not-notable. ;) I don't want to gripe you for trying, but this isn't a notable road by any means.Mitch32^{(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?)} 02:05, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop creating lists until you start improving them. These 3 lists (Schuyler, Yates & Lancaster) are so bad, that if I didn't want to set a bad precedent on Schuyler and Yates, I'd AFD these in a heartbeat. Schuyler and Yates are in desperate need of expansion. They are full of MOS violations, WP:RJL violations, need expansion desperately. I also suggest getting some practice at WP:GNG and help actually improve the state route articles already there in Pennsylvania, not make new lists that are redundant. PA still has 250+ stubs. Help expand some. Also that Lancaster list is badly cited. The Official PennDOT map does not mark any Quadrant Routes, therefore it can't possibly be cited to this list. PennDOT does provide county maps marking every single one. Use those, not the PennDOT map, because technically its "academic dishonesty" to cite something from a source that doesn't say that. Please try to improve your work before making more stuff.Mitch32^{(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?)} 02:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is no way i can respond to you because you don't have a user page, I better post my response here. Wikipedia is supposed to be a comprehensive site of collective minds and facts. I started these lists as a foundation on which to build. I know these lists are stubs and need more work, but I did at least get the ball rolling. As to "Academic Dishonesty", give me a break. I always cite my sources. I'm not a professional author or write, but I do have a B.S. Mapping Technology Degree. Although I listed the official PennDOT map, I intended it to mean their official Lancaster County Map, which by the way, Has PennDOT's Logo Right On It and has the quadrant routes clearly marked! These articles are not bad, because as a said before are not the final product, but just a beginning. All facts and data I have contributed are correct and accurate. I know how the syntax of the junction lists and follow their policies. Stop bashing and maybe you could improve these articles yourself.

P.S. A list is a list, not an article. People use lists to get facts, and not to read a novel.

Thanks

Geoboe84 (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These lists organize very similar topics together. An article covers a single subject. The content and comprehensiveness of articles/lists fall under the same rules more or less, and only the format is changed. It's not up to us to decide what readers want to read, its up to us to provide what they may want to read in a neutral and unbiased way. This is especially true of lists where the reader may just want to read one entry. Each entry must therefore contain a good coverage of its particular subject. Otherwise, you're just making a text-based map. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 14:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As for "academic dishonesty", it's more that you didn't specify the specific map used. I see that you changed the article [4], but until you made that change, you indicated a totally different source than what you used. Had someone wished to verify your work, they'd have sought out the wrong map. In the future, try to be very explicit. The best references give publishers, authors/cartographers, dates, titles and such so that anyone can find the specific source. We have {{cite map}} (and {{google maps}}, {{yahoo maps}}, {{bing maps}}) to create consistently formatted citations to maps. When I use any of the citation templates, I always aim to provide the maximum amount of information possible to aid readers in locating a source. Imzadi 1979 → 21:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Some of us have fancy signatures. In Mitchazenia's current case, the "Can someone turn on the damn" links to his user page, and "air conditioning" links to his user talk page. Floydian's name links to his page, the superscripted tau/t is his talk page, and the subscripted ¢/cents sign is his contributions list. In mine, stylized to look like a road sign, the numerical portion of my user name has a space inserted, but other wise my name links to my user page, and the arrow links to my talk page. Imzadi 1979 → 22:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you add the 6000s, 8000s and 9000s to this? They are still quadrant routes as much as the rest. Also can you use citation templates from this point ;) Mitch32^{(Can someone turn on the damn air conditioning?)} 14:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2011 Chinese Taipei Figure Skating Championships, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.askbiography.com/bio/2010_Chinese_Taipei_Figure_Skating_Championships.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, when you copy text from other Wikipedia articles, could you make sure that you provide proper attribution, either by saying in the first edit summary where the text has come from, or dropping a note on the article talkpage. It's especially important if you're using what someone else has written, perhaps not as important if you're copying your own work to start with, but it makes sure that everything complies with our licenses. Thanks, --BelovedFreak 11:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you are a member of the WikiProject Figure Skating, and are fairly active. Would you please review and reassess the quality grade of the U.S. Figure Skating article? I have significantly expanded the article and have included numerous citations and references. I understand it is considered bad form to rate one's own work. I believe that the article is now well beyond start and might even rise to the level of "B". Thank you very much. Jcflnj (talk) 15:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi user,

Our job as editors is to strengthen the quality and quantity of articles online, in accordance to Wikipedia's various policies.

One such tool used for efficient editing is the minor edit option. The idea is to separate undisputed edits from contentious ones. For instance, changing a typo from 'teh' to 'the' would be a minor edit, and may be marked such. The addition of performance standings of an athlete doesn't seem a catholic fact - people, like me, who don't know Li may want to challenge this edit. Hence, this is unlikely to be a minor edit.

You marked your edit (adding the competitive highlights) in the Li Chengjiang article as minor. For a better understanding of minor edits, visit the page here. If you marked it by accident, please look up dummy edits. If you are aware of these policies and still believe your edit was minor, just ignore this :). Ratibgreat (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Danmarksmestre i skøjteløb.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Danmarksmestre.pdf, which you've sourced to Dansk Skøjte Union. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Geoboe84! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–2012 Swedish Figure Skating Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isstadion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following is a copy of what you put on my talk page. I copy it here to make sure you see my PS. Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blanche,

I live in the U.S., and my father is from Trinidad. His mother's maiden name was McShine. I noticed that you used the book "The McShines of Trinidad" by Anthony De Verteuil as a reference. Would you happen to know where I could obtain a copy of that book? I have recently started researching my ancestry and have had much luck on my mother's side (all Americans) but not on my father's. Thanks. Geoboe84 (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, a friend of mine has gotten a copy of it from the Library of Congress in Washington, which had an excess copy which they sent her in exchange for some papers she sent them. I saw the copy at my friend's home. The Library of Congress should be able to give you specific information. Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 07:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You can try contacting my friend by mail, her name is Ilana Karmeli and she lives in Israel. Her mail is

<Ilana.karmeli.2009@hotmail.co.il> and she might be able to look up things for you in her copy and perhaps send you photocopies of some relevant passages. But it might take some time for her to answer you, as at the moment she is travelling in Europe and not always having access to her email. Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got the following information: "The McShines of Trinidad", ISBN 978-976-95008-7-9 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum, by Anthony De Verteuil, a lecturer at St. Mary's College, Port of Spain, Trinidad, was published 2006 by The Litho Press, Port of Spain, Trinidad. It was sent as a "surplus duplicate" by the Library of Congress, which means that this library has at least one copy of it and possibly more. The book has also gone through "The Blue Edition", 32 St. Vincent St., Funapuna,Trinidad & Tobago W.L. 868-645-8384 -and they might be able to provide a copy. . It tells about a family whose roots are traced back to a John McShine and his wife Caroline nee Arrindel, who were married in the 1860's in Barrouallie, St. Vincent, and who later emigrated to Trinidad to escape a very crushing poverty, and where their descendants rose to considerable local prominence. I don't know if they were among your direct ancestors. After February 20you can write Ilana at the above email address with more specific questions, which she would try to answer with the book in front of her and is ready to photocopy for you any excerpts which would prove to be of particular significance. Good luck! Blanche of King's Lynn (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please help me to correct an error in the article about the championship in 1934. In pairs skating, Hildegarde Schwarz / Eduards Goskhel, designated as a couple from the Soviet Union, but we know that the USSR did not participate skaters international competitions before the 50s. In the source on which to write the article, is the Soviet Union, but I've never heard of such a skater (I'm from Russia and I write articles about figure skating in the ru-wiki). So I searched and found a source - [5], where they are designated as the skaters of Latvia. This seems to be true, as the name of a man is "S" at the end, which is characteristic for Latvian names, but Latvia was not in the USSR in 1934. My English is not very good, and I'm afraid I can not explain myself editing, so I ask for your help. Thank you. --Luu (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Ondrej Nepela Memorial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisuke Murakami (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Ondrej Nepela Memorial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisuke Murakami (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geoboe84, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on 2013 Austrian Figure Skating Championships, appears to be directly copied from http://en.inforapid.org/index.php?search=Austrian%20Figure%20Skating%20Championships. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on 2013 Austrian Figure Skating Championships if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed that you have created {{NavigationFinnishChampionsFigureSkatingPairs}} and I wonder where did you get that data. :) There is typo in "1938–1936: Olga Saario / Edvard Linna" either it should be 1936-1938 or 1938-1939 I think. I don't have any sources for that so that's why I'm asking. Also there are gaps in results, so do you know if they just didn't compete in those years or is the data unknown? Best regards — linnea (talk) 20:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1993 Piruetten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Petri Kokko

Piruetten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Petri Kokko

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Rostelecom Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Eaton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Nebelhorn Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergei Voronov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Ondrej Nepela Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Cain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Danmarksmestre.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:09, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geoboe84! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geoboe84. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kazakhstani Figure Skating Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable figure skating competition, unreferenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uzbekistani Figure Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzbekistani Figure Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1998 Piruetten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 Piruetten until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2001 Merano Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Merano Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geoboe84. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Figure skating, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Figure skating and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Figure skating during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:33, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of quadrant routes in Adams County, Pennsylvania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of quadrant routes in Adams County, Pennsylvania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pennsylvania Quadrant Routes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ✗plicit 06:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2004 Spanish Figure Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Spanish Figure Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

`~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 06:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ronny Winkler has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Chinese Taipei Figure Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Chinese Taipei Figure Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pavel Roman Memorial has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mai Asada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mai Asada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mai Asada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alexandra Ievleva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amanda Nylander has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Isabelle Nylander has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the senior-level national championships explicitly do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Naphtal, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Naphtal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NavigationFinnishChampionsFigureSkatingPairs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda Nylander is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Nylander until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mexican Figure Skating Championships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2001–02 Swedish Figure Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001–02 Swedish Figure Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Serbian Figure Skating Championships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2001 Croatian Figure Skating Championships is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Croatian Figure Skating Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]