User talk:Geo7777
|
Wikilinks
We don't link well known words which are not closely related to the article. I reverted your edit to Hard water since neither metal nor plumbing provide much insight into hard water. See WP:OVERLINK for a more thorough discussion. Don't be discouraged though: Appropriate linking is one of the more finely nuanced Wikipedia skills to master. Thanks for your contributions! —EncMstr (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
ZnSO4
Almost certainly, all forms of zinc sulfate have the same aqueous solubility, when one corrects for the zinc content of the salt. Cheers,--Smokefoot (talk) 13:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the article, but do note that period 5 has 18 elements and loads of periodic trends, and there is more to a period than just its elements. :-) Oh, and you could also try doing similar stuff on period 4 element (quite similar, really). Lanthanum-138 (talk) 05:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
- It would be better to talk about trends across the filling of the 4d orbitals, than to just blindly steal sections from the elements articles. Sure, you can do some stealing of sections for periods 1, 2 and 3. But after that, it just starts looking like a gigantic wall of text...besides, there's more to a period than its elements. On the other hand, you might find your style for period 5 element more useful on the group articles. :-) Lanthanum-138 (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I understand, thanks for the heads up and the advice, I guess I will try your suggestion on the group articles. By the way, nice user name and page. I could never do something like that to my user page. --Geo7777 (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- I took the code from User:4/Userpage code, so thanks to 4 for setting it up. :-) Lanthanum-138 (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Periodic Table by Quality
Do take note that the image can sometimes be quite out of date. WP:ELEM/PTQ is a wikicode version and should contain the most up-to-date class rankings. The image was used up there on the announcements page because it's not possible to resize the table. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Boron group assessment
Hi Geo7777, please note that assessments below GA can be done by anyone (WP:GAN and WP:FAC are more formal processes). That said, I loooked at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. The first criteria is references and as there are still quite a few unreferenced parts in the article, I do not think it is quite at B class yet. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'd also like to add that it is not a Biology and Medicine-type article, but Chemistry and materials science-related. Atomician (talk) 15:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Linking to your talk page in different languages
Would Help:Interwiki linking help? Double sharp (talk) 11:56, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bassilo virus
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bassilo virus, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cameron11598 (Converse) 07:05, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey Geo! If you want to contribute in Arabic visit ar.wikipedia.org and sign in. In case of French language, go to fr.wikipedia.org. Hope these help you and enjoy contributing more. Sincerely,--Galy02 (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)