User talk:Gcrispus

i think your edits on provencher violate several basic tenets of wikipedia, eg, npov, verifieable claims, not libeling living persons. Ifyou can provide sources for your claims, restore the edits thanks

having consulted wikipedia:vandalism, I do not think you fall in that category . However, I do think your edits are (a) not npov; (b) certainly unsourced, and (c) probably violate policys relating to living people. that the other stuff (notable people...)on the page may or may not be wrong is not relevant; if it is wrong, change it (I am not responsible for that stuff - if you check the history log, it was there before my first edit).In any event, there are not a lot of people interested in this article, so we can go back and forth for a long time.Cinnamon colbert (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but why did you remove my edits to the Day Middle School page? Do you have a personal connections to the Daytime? And can you prove my facts as untrue? I removed your comments because they are not verifiable. Verifiablility is a fundamental policy of wikipedia ( go here, and look for the verifiable part http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About#Wikipedia_content_criteria) If, according to this policy, you can provide a source, then go for it. HOwever, you have not provided any sources, therefore I have deleted your material.

wikipedia also has strict rules on biograpies of living persons; i suspect these are to prevent libel lawsuits, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons If you go to this page , I think you will agree that your material qualifies for deletion.75.67.134.245 (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC) as to your other questions - obviously i have a connecton to dya,who else wuld bother ? As to disproving your facts, this stands on its head the basic wiki policy of verifibable material: it si the obligation of the poster to show that what they write is right. It is not the obligationn of others to disprove them. regards

re mond am edit - a model for wikipedia, if you can find similar sources, you can add whatever you like, as far as i am concerned Cinnamon colbert (talk) 13:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Grace Kelly, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Luke4545 (talk) 13:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]