User talk:GaudaSaraswaBrahmin

Hi, I have noticed that you are removing Sikhism sidebar from those Bhagat pages who are contributors of Guru Granth Sahib. If you want to add Hinduism sidebar please add it but why are you removing Sikhism sidebar from those pages? Jasksingh (talk)

Hello, I'm Kthxbay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kthxbay (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kalaripayattu. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kalaripayattu, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kalaripayattu. - Arjayay (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop marking your major edits as minor. PhilKnight (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you've recently been blocked for edit warring. Don't go down that same road again. Use the article talk page. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd add that your comment I am really stunned by your prejudice and arrogance in your edit summary is a personal attack, and goes against our civility policy. If you repeat an attack like that on another editor, I will block your account from editing. It is vitally important that you contribute here in a collaborative manner, without insulting people. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:34, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]