User talk:Filious Deo Frater Satanis

Hello, I'm Lazylaces. I noticed that in this edit to Stefan Molyneux, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 01:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Stefan Molyneux. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:47, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A definition of vandalism is in order. First I deleted unsubstantiated slander from an article and the slander was restored STILL UNSUBSTANTIATED, then I corrected improper use of sexual pronouns and said misuse was restored. Is Wikipedia dedicated to Orwellian use of language?

It just now occured to me that I should check and see if the Wikipedia article on women includes males who identify as women in its definition.

I'll return with my finding but here's something that should be sent up the ladder: If Wikipedia is going to engage in DELIBERATE DISINFORMATION, its higher-ups have 'COJONES GRANDE' to EVER e-beg from it's public. Filious Deo Frater Satanis (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Haela Hunt-Hendrix, you may be blocked from editing. Splatterxl – talk 18:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, hi there, ho there!

I just visited the article titled "Woman" and the VERY FIRST LINE states that a woman is "an adult female human". An adult. FEMALE. Human.

Wikipedia's words, equal in meaning to my own.

WIKIPEDIA CONFIRMS THAT WOMEN ARE FEMALE BY DEFINITION!

So are you going to clearly define how I've committed vandalism re: the delusional frontMAN from Liturgy?

Please don't be a coward and run from such a perfectly justified and simple challenge that I'm making IN THE NAME OF OBJECTIVE TRUTH AND REALITY.

Besides, if you make the cowardly choice and block me, I can always create a new e-mail address and then return so we can do this again.😁

I could also look into launching a CAMPAIGN FOR TRUTH on Wikipedia and see if I can make a viral snowball of it.

At the present moment, however, I would honestly and very much like to have a civil discourse with someone who represents Wikipedia, whoever it is.

Cheers much!! Filious Deo Frater Satanis (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]