User talk:Fearjesus
Welcome!
Hello, Fearjesus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ram Revilla Murder Case, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Beerest355 Talk 19:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Ram Revilla Murder Case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unneeded fork of Ram Revilla.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beerest355 Talk 19:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Ram Revilla Murder Case
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ram Revilla Murder Case. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ram Revilla. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ram Revilla – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JetBlast (talk) 19:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
- As reviewing administrator, let me suggest you would do much better to simply expand the section of the article. Be careful about WP:BLP -- I had to remove the existing section there written by another editor because of the lack of sources. Information about people charged with a crime and not convicted should be added only when supported by multiple reliable high-quality news sources, and the names are very widely known. Information about those against whom charges were dropped or who were not convicted is even more sensitive. Actual names of such people should if at all possible be avoided. unless there is wide reporting of them on a world-wide basis, not just the country concerned. WP is not a tabloid, and the widespread google presence of our articles gives us reason to be extremely cautious--the principle is Do No Harm. If you have questions about what to include, please ask at the BLP Noticeboard before adding it to the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Ram Revilla
You can try posting the article again by moving it. I'm not sure if it meets Wikipedia's guide for inclusion, but you can let other editors decide for you. Beerest355 Talk 15:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
WARNING
If you add material in violation of BLP policy again, anywhere on Wikipedia, you will be blocked. We do not add names of people accused of crimes but then release, or those merely under suspicion. x under BLP policy.
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ram Revilla may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 19 <ref name="031213TSN" /> ) he said, he was "weird" and wearing a long sleeves and maong jeans (Page 3, No.29 <ref name="tabadass" />. He saw RJB going out at exactly 10:54pm (Page 3, No.23 <ref
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Fearjesus, you are invited to the Teahouse
![]() |
Hi Fearjesus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |