User talk:Dr. Kadzi/Archives/2020/July
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Speedy deletion declined: CloudSEK
Hello Dr. Kadzi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of CloudSEK, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's enough sources going into enough depth suffieicnt for A7. Needs to go to AfD if required. . Thank you. GedUK 10:56, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Help move Elizabeth Amoah Tetteh out of draft
Hi Dr Kadzi, Sorry I published while still working on the article for Elizabeth Amoah-Tetteh. Could you please help move it out of draft space. Can't seem to figure out how to it. Thanks. PS:I'm taking part in a WikiProject Competition and I hope to sign my name to the article before someone else creates it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naa2Darkoa (talk • contribs) 20:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Naa2Darkoa: Please continue to work on Elizabeth Amoah Tetteh and I will request speedily deletion of the draft on your behalf Kadzi (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello sir, I was just wondering if you could take a look to my draft on the heading. It has been pending for about a month and I would love to have some feedback. Thanks and have a great day. Kriptocurrency (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Dr. Kadzi:, I am very thankful for your review & comments. Made me rethink everything. I did some deep research and updated to the best I could the draft's sources. Also I commented what I think are HYPR three best sources (WP:THREE) and will try for a second opinion on the subject. Kriptocurrency (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
question about independent sources
Hi, thank you for your answer, why is a print article of an established magazine, a TV broadcast and a radio broadcast not enough as from the subject independent sources? Raymondr1877 (talk) 17:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Raymondr1877 (talk) 17:43, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/80px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
Hi Dr. Kadzi. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Kadzi, I left you some comments at WP:PERM/NPR I'd ask you to take a look at. Thanks and best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Barkeep49: Thank you, just read them. Fair comments and thank you for the extension. I agree re. that specific draftify and accept I made a mistake there. In regards to any unanswered questions about NPP on my talk page - I can try to answer any specifics for you if it'll help, if not, I'll be working hard for the next 4 months, thanks! Kadzi (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Dr. Kadzi, on the communication front I would just ask you to respond to the editors in the two sections right above this. When functioning in an administrative area, as NPP/AFC is, there is a responsibility for communication. So I don't need answers but the editors who have questions do have a fair expectation of a response to questions. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Barkeep49: Thank you, just read them. Fair comments and thank you for the extension. I agree re. that specific draftify and accept I made a mistake there. In regards to any unanswered questions about NPP on my talk page - I can try to answer any specifics for you if it'll help, if not, I'll be working hard for the next 4 months, thanks! Kadzi (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Axens
Hello Dr.Kadzi,
You have reviewed the draft page of Axens and declined the submission. Could you please specify which parts of the article is not acceptable? For your information, this submission is based on the French version (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axens#cite_ref-1) which has been accepted.
Thanks in advance for your help and support, --Magentas97 (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Magentas97: Although the topic may be notable, at the time I declined it because it read like an advertisement and was not in the correct tone to be a Wikipedia article. Please see WP:TONE to read on how an article should read neutrally. Thank you. Kadzi (talk) 19:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Opium (Record Label)
Hello Dr. Kadzi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Opium (Record Label), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having been founded by a notable person indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#CORP, WP:CCSI#ORG). Thank you. SoWhy 07:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Redirect
I wanted to redirect [Fortnite: Save The World]] to Fortnite: Save the World
"The" was capitalized and just leads to an error page, so I made a redirect. Kuletxcore (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Oops... It was Fortnite: Save The World Kuletxcore (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
As we all know, everything is case sensitive Kuletxcore (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Also, if a redirect doesn't exist in Fortnite STW, I would love to make one as well Kuletxcore (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Turns out, the latter redirect exists! Awesome! Kuletxcore (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Kuletxcore:
Thank you; given what you said I'm going to resubmit and accept the draft for the sake of removing it from the AfC but please in the future if you are unsure about redirects upload them to Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects_and_categories , or just create the redirect page yourself and patrollers will delete it if necessary. Kadzi (talk) 07:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Kuletxcore due to the nature of the Articles for Creation system I cannot create this , please simply create the page yourself at Fortnite:_Save_The_World. Kadzi (talk) 07:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
I AM STILL WORKING ON IT
Hi, Dr. Kadzi. Please do not delete Super Orb Collector as I am still working on it. Also, please tell me what I can do to improve it. Thank you! Bumsowee (talk | contribs) 16:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Bumsowee: In its current form it will almost certainly be deleted. I suggest you start a draft article at Draft:Super_Orb_Collector to work on it there, and then submit it without the risk of a deletion discussion. Kadzi (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Bumsowee: as for what you can do to improve it, if you feel the game has in depth coverage from multiple sources, news articles for example, then please reference those. Right now, I could not find one source online that mentions the game. Please read WP:GNG to learn about what is notable. Kadzi (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey Dr. Kadzi, I'm very confused about what I would need to do to get the Rishi Kumar article approved. I am creating this article because I believe in democracy. I believe that not having an article brings Rishi an unfair disadvantage. I would be forever grateful if you can guide me in this process User: PoliticalEddy
- @PoliticalEddy: There are multiple things holding this article back. Firstly, the destination page is protected. This is because Rishi Kumar has been deleted 3 times in the past, so an administrator has decided to prevent people recreating the page. The last time it was deleted was in 2017. The next steps would be to get this protection removed. I have already asked the administrator that protected it in the first place to remove the protection to potentially make way for your draft article. When this is done, I will review your draft and inform you of the next steps. Kadzi (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Dr. Kadzi: Thank you so much! I'm exited to be working with you on this!
The 4EyezWhiteDragon
Hi, I could see your comment about "The 4EyezWhiteDragon" article, and I want to know what I need to get it on wikipedia. Oh, thanks for taking something of your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willyoro (talk • contribs) 22:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the message @Willyoro: I rejected the article because the person in question was not notable. This means that there were no sources for this person to be found online. An example of a source could be a news article. This would show that the person is notable because they have been the subject of a news article. Unfortunately 4EyezWhiteDragon does not appear online in any independent form and therefore was not notable enough for inclusion within Wikipedia. If you’d like advise from someone else, or a second opinion please ask the question here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template%3AAFC_submission%2Fdeclined%2FHD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft%3AThe_4EyezWhiteDragon Kadzi (talk) 22:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Dr. Kadzi: Thank you so much, I'm going to work on it.
Hi Dr. Kadzi, just a quick heads-up that we've had a user come into the IRC help channel to note that the above draft has been marked as in review by you for around fifteen hours now, and they're wondering what's going on as the template says to ask if there's no update within twelve. Cheers, stwalkerster (talk) 11:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Stwalkerster: thanks for the message. I am reviewing the article and intend to likely accept it, however there is a redirect at Pichu that needs to be speedily deleted before I can go ahead, which is what is causing the delay. Kadzi (talk) 11:20, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Gotcha, I've deleted that for you now :) stwalkerster (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank You!(Oinkers42) (talk) 11:22, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Gotcha, I've deleted that for you now :) stwalkerster (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Non-admin closure of Cobb Education Television AFD
You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobb Education Television as no consensus. I am asking you to reverse your close. The only "keep" !vote did no provide any policy based arguments. The "redirect" !vote acknowledged that almost nothing in the way of sourcing could be found which reinforces the position of "delete". -- Whpq (talk) 13:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Whpq: I could not relist the discussion again, and there had been no further comments to an already ‘no consensus’ discussion - which is why I feel No consensus is appropriate given the arguments put forward. There was no clear cut consensus. Feel free to appeal the decision at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thank you. Kadzi (talk) 13:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Deletion review for Cobb Education Television
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cobb Education Television. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Whpq (talk) 13:50, 31 July 2020 (UTC)