User talk:Dmitry Azikov

Hi Dmitry Azikov! I noticed your contributions to John Uroš and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Longhair\^talk 08:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The inclusion of ahnentafeln has been extensively discussed at Template talk:Ahnentafel. I kindly suggest not adding them unless you can demonstrate that reliable sources specializing in the subject (e.g. published biographies) contain them. Surtsicna (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add large ancestry tables to articles. Some people think these sections should be removed and some think they should be expanded. Community consensus has thus resolved somewhere in the middle: they should be restricted to the first 4 generations only. Thanks. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Celia, So I think they look pretty good that very great help to study royal genealogies, I remember that in past years late 2010-s around 2017-2019 than I began actively to study royal medieval genealogies there were common 5 generations and 4 generations of ancestors, I studied very good genealogy of royal medieval European kings, but okay. And in other wiki's there are no such consensus in Russian 5 generations and in French even 6. Dmitry Azikov (talk) 09:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this, Foundation for Medieval Genealogy is not considered a reliable source. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, well, okay Dmitry Azikov (talk) 20:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry I of England. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense诉 05:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, but what is disruptive in these ancestors of king Henry I of England with a source? Dmitry Azikov (talk) 05:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I requested that you discuss the addition on the talk page; just because material is sourced does not mean it should be included. Charts take up considerable space in articles, so it would be nice to discuss whether it makes what is already a featured article better. Remsense诉 05:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Okay, but there was no such sctrict rules about royal ancestry in past years and rules are no such sctrict in others wikis like french, spanish and russian, and rules it seems that Wikipedia became not best place to add and look royal ancestries like other genealogical websources like geni.com, my.heritage and geneall even because in English wiki there shouldn't be more than 4 generations in charts of ancestry up to great-grandparents lncluding a person of article him/herself... I also suggested a new variant of his ancestry with more references such authority like Burke's peerage in talk page. And what do you think is a book (Frederick Lewis Weis, Walter Lee Sheppard, William Ryland Beall, Kaleen E. Beall, Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists who Came to America Before 1700) a good source for royal ancestry? https://books.google.ru/books?id=3F9nG8aFJ7MC&vq=William+the+conqueror&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s Dmitry Azikov (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]