User talk:Deep Shadow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
User:Deep Shadow User talk:Deep Shadow User:Deep Shadow/Sandbox User:Deep Shadow/Awards User:Deep Shadow/Userboxes Special:Contributions/Deep Shadow
Home Talk Sandbox Awards Userboxes Edit Counter

Please don't ask me to sign guestbooks, signature books, autograph books or whatever you may call them. I don't like doing it and I always feel obligated to sign. From now on I will refuse to do so, no matter what.

RE: Our next project

I had a feeling you would pick Victoria! I'd love to see both Victoria and Torrie Wilson's articles as GAs. We could definitely then work on Vince's Devils. We might even attempt to do a Featured Topic at some point, but I think the articles have to all be (or mostly be) at Featured status for that to happen. You know, if we keep going at the speed we're going at, we're going to run out of Divas. :) Nikki311 02:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. The week is up if you want to go ahead and add Mickie James to the nominees list. Also, Melina Perez was reviewed, and there is a list of things to fix on the talk page, if you want to help me bulldoze through all of that. Nikki311 14:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Mickie in Legshow: Basically, that is what I meant. Plus, if somebody wanted to, they could do a google images search to verify. I doubt she'll ever do an interview and be like "Yeah. I posed nude in a raunchy classless magazine"....so that'll have to suffice. At one point I even added <ref>{{cite magazine|title=Legshow|date=whatever the date was}}</ref> but clearly it was removed, I'm not sure by who, but the info is all over the net, so it clearly is true. Nikki311 20:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For all your hardwork on reverting vandalism. Speed CG Talk 17:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]


You're welcome. You know you'd outta try Twinkle. It would save you some time. Speed CG Talk 17:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Another Diva

Awesome. Thanks. Nikki311 03:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. Sorry about taking more than a month to get my act together! I've been busy with school, real life, and admin stuff. I've looked over Victoria's article and fixed a few things, but nothing major jumps out at me as needing to be fixed. After you look over Wilson's article, let's go ahead and give our GA announcement to the project. There's a huge backlog at WP:GAC under the sports section, so I think we should go ahead and list them asap, before another 40 articles are listed before them. In other news, I'm working on Dawn Marie Psaltis in my sandbox because I found a lot of good sources for her when I was researching Wilson. Nikki311 03:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I made the corrections in Wilson's article, and I removed the favorite TV shows from Varon's personal life section. I think the article can do without that trivia. I'll go ahead and make the announcement. Nikki311 04:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated both articles because the week is up. Now all we have to do is wait the 2 months it'll take to get them reviewed. :) Nikki311 04:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could go either way. Doing only present Divas would be easier, obviously, because there is less of them. Another option is to do all former WWE Women's Champions. Then we could use the List of WWE Women's Champions as the main article that links to all the others (like List of current champions in WWE), and it's already featured, so that would make our job easier. Whatever we decide, I'm pretty sure at least 2/3 of the articles have to be featured, and the rest have to be good articles. Maybe we should start small...and do a Vince's Devils FT, which I think you've mentioned before. After Varon and Wilson pass GA, we can work on them some more and try and nominate them as FAs. Nikki311 05:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations to you, as well! Victoria has also passed GA review. Nikki311 22:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are planning to work on another article soon or not, but I'm going to start working on Stacy Keibler. I just wanted to let you know, so we don't work on the same one. Nikki311 19:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ashley Massaro

That edit is enough for me to throw out the second idea. Your original idea sounds fine. So your original idea sounds fine for this situation. :) Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, any time. :) The last thing I want to do is edit war. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Marie Psaltis

Thanks. I had a feeling that it was unintentional. I know that you have high standards on Wikipedia, but I wanted to make sure nobody else complained down the road that it was passed without a proper review. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Keibler

Lisa Marie Varon was just nominated as a Featured Article candidate. Why does that keep happening to us?!?! I think we should let it play out at first to see if we can get some comments on how to improve the article, but if a couple people start opposing, we should get whoever nominated it to withdraw the nom. Thoughts?!? Nikki311 03:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That was fast! Good detective work. I hope that sockpuppet didn't think that our article was so bad that nominating it was disruptive. :( Nah. Who am I kidding? We do do the best work around here. We should think of a tag team name like the The Kilq editing stable. Ya know...so we can be cool like they are. ;) Nikki311 04:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I probably won't be able to get to it until Wednesday because of real-life stuff, and I promised to help some other people with their articles first. Anyway, I think we should be The Hooliganz...I think that sounds bad-ass. Too bad there aren't any good intergender tag teams whose name we could use. :) Nikki311 23:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Also, are you good at pre-GA reviews? I'd like somebody to give Matt Hardy are pre-GA review before I nominate it for GA. Is there any chance you can do this for me? iMatthew 2008 13:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Cheers! iMatthew 2008 14:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle under GA review

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eudemons.gif) Thanks for uploading Image:Eudemons.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/The World's Greatest Tag Team/archive1

You're welcome. ♥NiciVampireHeart08:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just to update you, the topic has now passed. See Wikipedia:Featured topics/The World's Greatest Tag Team. Thanks, ♥NiciVampireHeart01:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]