User talk:Cassidyschap

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Found Footage 3D.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Anne Delong (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cassidyschap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Found Footage 3D, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 09:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Found Footage 3D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Found Footage 3D until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 21:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know they userfied the article at User:Cassidyschap/Found Footage 3D. I'm going to keep it on my watchlist and try to help edit it as well. I figure that this is mostly the waiting game at this stage. When it releases it'll likely gain a ton of coverage. I'd be surprised if it didn't, but the biggest issue is that we can never guarantee the coverage. For example, I've got a few articles sitting in my userspace that I'm wholly surprised haven't been covered more, such as Bill Oberst's (whom I am now completely in love with actor-wise) upcoming film Deadly Revisions. He's the new It-Guy in horror right now, so part of me is frustrated that this hasn't been poured over by the various media sites. We also have cases where something can seem like something will be almost guaranteed to be made and filming is slated to occur at a specific time, but then it just never happens. In any case, this doesn't look like it'll be one of those instances (I hope) so it's pretty much just us waiting for the coverage to roll in. BTW, you might be interested in joining WP:FILM or WP:HORROR, both of which are WikiProjects devoted to their respective topics (film and horror). Horror is semi-active, but film is pretty rolling. (Sorry if this seems a little rambling. It's been a long night for me so far and I'm running solely on coffee right now.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that an IP tried to submit the article via AfC, so I am assuming it is you. I've declined the AfC nomination because none of the issues brought up at AfD have been dealt with. No additional coverage has been forthcoming and the article is basically the same as it was while it was up for deletion, so I can guarantee that trying to move or re-add this to the mainspace will only lead to the article getting deleted. I really, really recommend that you wait until the film releases. Unless it's a highly visible film (which usually translates to mainstream coverage or an extreme indie darling), most horror films don't get any substantial coverage until they release and the reviews start pouring in. When this releases it's going to be extremely, extremely likely that FF3D will receive reviews based on the names involved, but it's never a guarantee and we really need to have that coverage before the article goes back in the mainspace. Trying to re-add it before it's ready and passes WP:NFILM will only end with the article getting moved back to the userspace (best case scenario) or deleted entirely (worst case scenario). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]