User talk:Capt. Milokan

Hello, Capt. Milokan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The article Havana Cooler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a recipe (WP:NOT). No indication of notability (WP:N).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sandstein 09:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I am sorry. I will fix that right now. Capt. Milokan (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Havana Cooler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Havana Cooler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kendall-K1 (talk) 23:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I hope not. I did add some additional sources. Capt. Milokan (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider your WP:NAC here and leave it for someone with more experience in evaluationg these things. Almost all of the !votes are SPAs and newly registered accounts not making policy based arguments. Additionally this still has a full hour left on it and this has several, so you need to revert your close.Praxidicae (talk) 17:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone your Perry Stone closure given there are several hours left until it should be closed (and honestly it should be relisted.) Praxidicae (talk) 17:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD opened on April 14 and was relisted twice, with no one calling for its deletion except the person who put it up for deletion. Closing it one hour early doesn't strike me as being catastrophic, but then again I only look at this as a relaxing hobby and not an obsession. If you feel that a third relisting can get the result you want, your actions have my blessing. Capt. Milokan (talk) 22:41, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Capt. Milokan, thanks for your contributions. I'm glad you're getting involved with the administrative aspects of Wikipedia; we appreciate all the help we can get in the WikiGnome-y areas. I wanted to let you know I am overturning your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elise Matthesen in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator for two reasons: First, the closure was over one full hour before the scheduled close. Second, and more importantly, I am concerned that you aren't experienced enough around here to have a strong knowledge of policy, process, and subject matter (see WP:NAC). Please let me know if you have any questions. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have also overturned the closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TG Mohandas in accordance with WP:BADNAC, points 2 and 3. The result here could easily have been a relist or a no-consensus close based on the number of SPAs !voting in the AfD. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that closing an AfD one hour early, especially when it was obvious that no one wanted it deleted, was such a bad thing. But, as I mentioned to the person who commented earlier, I view this as a relaxing hobby and not an obsession, so you are welcome to do whatever you feel makes the website work better. Capt. Milokan (talk) 22:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your comments at this AfD !vote constitute a personal attack. Please make sure to keep your cool when participating in debates on Wikipedia. ST47 (talk) 02:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please lead by example and keep your cool when lecturing people on their own pages. There is no "personal attack," as no person was specifically identified by name in order to be maligned. I am discussing an editorial deletion decision that I considered to be seriously erroneous. Capt. Milokan (talk) 17:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, SCENEtourage is owned by SCENE. Why is this being removed? SCENEtourage Loyal Member (talk) 01:29, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why would you call it spam? SCENEtourage Loyal Member (talk) 03:04, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am in fact a SCENEtourage Loyal Member, so I will continue to have my name what I am. SCENEtourage Loyal Member (talk) 01:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are confused as to what SCENEtourage is, you may direct to the Cineplex website and look up the info under “Scene” to read the same info that is being attempted to post here SCENEtourage Loyal Member (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]