User talk:Borinquen1996

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Judeo-Christian has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Judeo-Christian was changed by Borinquen1996 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888891 on 2017-02-16T19:22:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan was changed by Borinquen1996 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959048 on 2017-02-24T15:17:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding tangential events to see also sections and templates. The Kennedy assassination and Pearl Harbor have nothing at all to do with each other, for instance. Acroterion (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the Kennedy assassination took place during the Cold War doesn't make it a feature of the Cold War. This is the kind of thing to be done by consensus, not just on a hunch that it's sort of related. Acroterion (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And please explain what this edit [1] was supposed to be accomplishing. And no, the Gulf War had little to do with the Cold War. Acroterion (talk) 21:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Before adding a category to an article, as you did to September 11 attacks, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Juantheman96. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• that account is not me

• What account is you, then? Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Western Europe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
  

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rob984 (talk) 00:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The vast majority of your edits which I have examined show that you are editing with a distinct point of view. Continuing to do so may be grounds for you to be blocked from editing. Please familiarize yourself with our mandatory policy on editing with a neutral point of view. You cannot edit according to your own political philosophy, or your view of what is and isn't right, you must edit neutrally, as explained in the policy. If I continue to see your edits being biased, I will bring your behavior to the attention of admins and the editing community, to decide whether you should be blocked or banned. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN talk to me 05:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]