User talk:Bhalla4321

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to 360-degree feedback. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 360-degree feedback, you may be blocked from editing. If you continue to add copyright info to the above or other articles such as Performance Appraisal your account will be blocked Tmol42 (talk) 21:07, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Tmol42 (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 360-degree feedback, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tmol42 (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Performance appraisal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ~~ GB fan ~~ 11:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru (talk) 12:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]