User talk:Atlantis77177

Hello, I'm AviationFreak. An edit you recently made to Daniel Cormier seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AviationFreak💬 04:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Assassin7177! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! Salimfadhley (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salimfadhley (talk) Thanks for helping me out friend. I am truly grateful to you. I have made 2 corrections as you told me to do. But won't removing the entire cast list make the article too small. Should I look for a strong source or should I delete it. Assassin7177 (talk)

Hi Assassin7177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Creating a new article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Assassin7177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changing the title of an article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a PR notice for a non notable youtubechannel. The references a re usual PR that is found in newspapers

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karikku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karikku, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was no need to move Draft:Karikku to Draft:Karikku (Web Series) ; there is no article called "Karikku" so a disambiguation of the title is unnecessary. In addition, what the draft is called is not that important since it is not part of the encyclopedia – but since the draft and the article Karikku have a history with multiple deletions it is preferrable to stick to that title, to avoid misunderstandings. I have moved it back for you. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 17:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#My article was declined (permalink), you wrote This [that is, asking for an explaintion of why Draft:Karikku was declined] is really important for me.

I am curious, why is it important to you?

Actually, don't answer that. It's a rhetorical question. However, YOU need to know why it is important to you. YOU need to know if you are "too closely connected" to the subject to write about it objectively, with a neutral point of view. It is best to avoid writing on topics that you feel strongly about or which you cannot be objective about for whatever reason.

Please also read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Paid editing disclosure. If you have a conflict of interest with respect to this or any other topic you write about, it is highly recommended that you follow that guideline. It is also highly recommended that you disclose any conflicts of interest you have. Failure to follow these rules is very likely to make editing Wikipedia a very frustrating experience for you.

If the paid editing disclosure applies to you, you must follow the rules outlined on that page. It is not optional. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been asked about conflict of interest. I will point out that when an editor is as disruptively persistent in asking to have a draft approved, many editors assume that they probably are being paid, and that they are in a hurry to have the article approved so that they can be paid. That is exactly how some of us are viewing your questions. What is especially annoying and suspicious is asking other editors to edit your draft for you so that it will be accepted (and then you will perhaps be paid for the unpaid work of volunteers). You are being disruptive and are likely to be topic-banned or blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I have committed a mistake (talk). It was just personal interest that drove me to this topic and nothing else, and it was just the passion to get it published, for many others, who support Karikku like me that drove me to try to know more

If a reviewer considers the subject likely to be notable they will approve it. Please do not post about it on my tallk p. again. DGG ( talk ) 15:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Toffan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Toffan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Should i rename my article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Changing the username, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Arthur H. Warner, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 06:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to tag my article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My article was declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jstalins: Jstalins talk I am a new editor and I created a new article on the malayalam youtube channel- Karikku. An AFC editor who was impressed by my article, but did not know about the relevant sources used in it, asked it as a question in Wikiproject India. He recieved two indirect but positive responses, and is waiting for more. Please give your valuable comments at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#I need a notability check here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#I_need_a_notability_check_here)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karikku. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Summary: The draft is in the process of being accepted. It is on hold because the target page is "create protected." I have asked the administrator who protected it to remove the protection. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karikku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Reliable sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Bengaluru FC records, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. The sources do not support the claims in the article.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 23:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Order of the Phoenix (fictional organisation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Deleting a redirect, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

It's great fun trying to edit the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources list isn't it? I had a good few goes myself recently. From the commentary and the discussion, I reckon that 'generally unreliable' is a more appropriate classification than 'no consensus'. I have amended the entry appropriately, but should you disagree, feel free to undo my change. 86.140.67.152 (talk) 13:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Atlantis, can you explain why you restored your addition on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources in Special:Diff/988488109? Please note that one discussion posted doesn't merit an addition on the perennial list, let alone within 48 hours of the one discussion being started. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I request you to help me, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177. Wanted to let you know that I've reverted most of your contributions to Yoel Romero, as they contain excessive bias and personal opinions, such as "one of the greatest 3-round fights in the history of the UFC" and "the fight was expected to be explosive and eventful". The sources you're citing aren't really optimal either, live stats of the bouts aren't an excuse to back up personal opinions. If you want to contribute that's fine, but I'd suggest to stop editing the article bc you aren't really being of much help to be honest, the article is already pretty complete and doesn't contain a lot of flaws that can be fixed in major changes to the page. Thanks. PabloLikesToWrestle (talk) 16:36 , 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Republic TV, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About the karikku page; I didnt add anything more into the page to make some grammatical errors. Using # and some other characters is not as per wikipedia standards. So please clarify to me the actual reason for reverting the edit. May be you could have explained that in the edit history. Anyway Im going for the same cleanup in that page. You can ping me for any updates. Thank you Shahoodu (talk) 04:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the article Mazhavil entertainment awards 2019 has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to participate in the discussion Shahoodu (talk) 04:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following was your comment in one of your talk page discussions. ""It was just personal interest that drove me to this topic and nothing else, and it was just the passion to get it published, for many others, who support Karikku like me that drove me to try to know more"". Hence, I have declared your COI on the Karikku page. Thankyou Shahoodu (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Day International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian cricket. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to apologize if my action had hurt you. Believe me, I just want the editors to follow the guidelines and strictly act against disruptive editing and vandalism. When I went through your talk page, I happened to notice that comment so I wanted to declare COI. Sorry for my action if you were acting on god faith. By the way you cam remove the COI if you want. Or should I do that?? Shahoodu (talk) 15:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also apologized on your talk page, but it got mixed up and is now part of another heading.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 15:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I saw that. Im not experienced in moving contents between talk pages. You better seek help of some other users. And please remove the COI. I hope that sorts this mess we created Shahoodu (talk) 15:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Half Barnstar
		For your civility and cooperation with User:Shahoodu regarding Karikku. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mazhavil entertainment awards 2019 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Listen, I don't know how to explain this to you if it's not already obvious, but nominating Joe Biden and Donald Trump for GA at this moment, of all moments, is an extremely bad idea. Among other things, there's no way the can meet the stability criterion. I urge you to withdraw the nominations immediately. EEng 07:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent GAN review

Hi. Listen. (per EEng) - something is plainly very wrong with your review of my GA nomination of Virabhadrasana. I assume this must be a fit of pique for some action I took on an edit of yours, but that can't explain your erratic nominations at GA as documented in EEng's thread above. That kind of behaviour is uncollegiate and unacceptable here on Wikipedia, and of course it can get you blocked. If you think I made a mistake, tell me and we can discuss it; I'm more than happy to explain. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap:, if I have made an error, I apologize and give you permissions to revert my errored edits.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you, but we now need to remove the page altogether and put the article back where it was in the GAN queue, since you have actually not addressed the state of the article AT ALL - for instance, it is fully cited. Please do not undertake GA reviews (or any other task) without taking the time first to understand what that task entails. I've asked a member of the GA team to sort the matter out. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Chiswick Chap, since you're already enmeshed in this, can you (while you're at it) do whatever needs to be done to un-nominate Joe Biden and Donald Trump -- see top of this (merged) thread. EEng 19:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree with you, EEng, that the nominations are inappropriate at this time. Atlantis77177, would you mind removing your nominations from Talk:Joe Biden and Talk:Donald Trump as soon as possible please, to save a lot of needless work and complication - that would be much appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think he did that once already, when I first posted here; someone put it back. And now someone's removed them again -- and here I'm talking only about the notice on the article talk pages. I think the deeper problem is to untangle the noms from the GA review apparatus, and I was hoping you knew which levers to pull to do that. EEng 21:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did exactly as you said. This must be someone else.--#bodyContent a[title="Assassin77177"] { background-color: #00BFFF; color: #ffffff; font-weight: bold; } (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It seems pretty clear that Atlantis77177 doesn't know enough about the GA process or how to apply its criteria to either review or nominate: while the review said it was failed, it wasn't actually failed at the article's talk page, so the nomination was still open when I found it. While we figure out how to proceed, I've upped the template's page number so the nomination retains its seniority and a new review can be opened at any time. If you prefer, Chiswick Chap, we could instead put out a call for a new reviewer to take over the review from Atlantis77177. (Note that the Biden and Trump nominations should never have been made: people who have not made significant contributions to an article should not nominate them unless they have previously consulted with the significant editors on the article's talk page—had this been done, the answer would certainly have been "not at this time" due to the inherent instability, even beyond whether it met the other criteria.)

(Added after edit conflict): Atlantis77177, the Trump nomination was properly deleted, but when you attempted to remove the Biden nomination, more than the nomination itself was deleted in this edit], so it was reverted, but another editor later deleted just the GA nominee template. That's what EEng was referring to. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More nominations

About a quarter of an hour after BlueMoonset's post above, you nominated President of India for GA. Three minutes later, you nominated Prime Minister of India, followed by Indo-European languages, BTS, and Rafael Nadal – five GA nominations within 25 minutes! The last three nominations were quickly reverted by an editor who observed that you had no contributions to those articles. You haven't edited the articles President of India and Prime Minister of India either, nor had you made any edits to those article talk pages to discuss the nomination with other editors, and I have removed the nominations. Why did you nominate these articles for GA? Or, for that matter, Sachin Tendulkar, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Conor McGregor (which you nominated yesterday, all three of which were quickly removed for the same reason)? Evaluating whether an article is a good candidate for a GA nomination requires experience, and it takes much more than a couple of minutes to make that kind of judgment, even for a very experienced editor. It also looks like you hadn't consulted the instructions which explain what the requirements are.

Please get a lot more editing experience before you start participating in this kind of behind-the-scenes work. A few days ago you also made a couple of not very constructive edits to project space pages – [1] and [2] – inserting an article you created yourself in the assessment table, which in itself is a questionable choice, and not doing it correctly. And a final thing: it looks like you have recently edited your signature so it displays your previous user name. Why? --bonadea contributions talk 11:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Hinduism, you may be blocked from editing.

You nominated Hinduism for GA despite the fact that you have not been involved in editing it. You apparently did not take the time to investigate why it was de-listed, you did not start a discussion at Talk:Hinduism to make the case for the nomination as I advised you to do here, and the nomination was against the advice of one editor who is has a lot of experience with GAs as well as another very experienced editor who has done a lot of work on that article. Please take some time to get familiar with what a Good Article actually is and what the requirements are, and please get more editing experience before you get involved in that process. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring. The consensus is clear. Read WP:Edit warring and WP:Consensus. If you keep edit warring over this, you will be WP:Blocked. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Copyright, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is this vandalism?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Rick O'Connel, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick O'Connell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex O'Connell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of these need work. Most of the references are brief mentions of the characters. Refs about the actors who play the avatar roles do not contribute to the avatars' notability. Lengthy plot summaries do not belong in articles about the characters, only in articles about the movies. Alternatively, these should be deleted, and content about the fictional characters exist as content in the articles about the movies. David notMD (talk) 11:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Republic TV, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, A doubt, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star Gold; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm an user from English Wikisource currently dealing with s:Index:Kerala Police Act, 2011.pdf. I found that normal OCR cannot correctly identify some Malayalam characters on s:Page:Kerala Police Act, 2011.pdf/1 and s:Page:Kerala Police Act, 2011.pdf/2.

As an active user on WikiProject Kerala, I hope that you can help with the transcription of these two pages by inserting the missing characters. They have been marked properly by "language characters" templates, and can be done by replacing them with the corresponding Malayalam characters.

I'll appreciate your useful assistance, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 07:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: I am so sorry, but even though I am fluent with the language, I am a novice, here in Wikipedia, as well as with the digital and literary field. I think it would be better for you to go to anyone else in WikiProject Kerala. So sorry for dissapointing you.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@廣九直通車: From my basic knowledge, every important point is stated in both Malayalam and English. ie;- Every Malayalam statement is the translation of its preceeding English statement.--Atlantis77177 (talk) 08:49, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that the problems have been solved by another user. Thanks for your attention!廣九直通車 (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Stallone-Schwarzenegger rivalry, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Anoop Sasikumar, one of the upcoming writers in Malayalam literature and an economist, is facing deletion. You may find the discussion here. Please look into it and should you feel that the subject of the article is notable, please post your opinion in the discussion. Malayalam is spoken by a small number of people, hence it is natural that what is notable here may not carry the same weight elsewhere. But still we may try our little mite.--jojo@nthony (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I answered at WP:TEA#Freddie Mercury's nationality, but forgot to ping you, so leaving a note about it here. cheers! Pelagic ( messages ) – (15:02 Sat 23, AEDT) 04:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for late response on Karikku. I have removed the notability maintenance tag as the article clearly satisfies notability criteria for web content. Let's see if anyone raises any red flags.--Anoopkn (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Freddie Mercury's nationality, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atlantis77177! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:09, Thursday, January 28, 2021 (UTC)

Hello there. I had to fail your DYK nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Prem Nazir as it does not pass the newest criteria as part of the rules at WP:DYK. I suggest reading through these rules that I've linked above. I also saw that your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Gary Lineker was also failed for the same reason by a different user. Hopefully you will be encouraged to nominate again at DYK after reading and understanding these DYK rules. Thank you for your nominaions! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 05:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of reviewing Doraemon sometime in the near future. I just want to know if you are still active so you will reply to my review, since you haven't edited in over 2 weeks. If you do not reply to this message in one week, I will remove the GA nom template. Have a good day. Link20XX (talk) 05:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: I'm definetly active. I just felt that the article was ready(Humbly). You can expect 100% coorporation from me. @Link20XX:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doraemon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Link20XX -- Link20XX (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Doraemon you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Doraemon for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Link20XX -- Link20XX (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adityan Rajesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georgina Rodriguez (model), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Georgina Rodriguez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aaron Crow (performer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lamar Jackson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lamar Jackson you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lamar Jackson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aaron Crow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karikku is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karikku (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, Atlantis77177. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muhammed Ali vs. Joe Frazier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Atlantis77177! The list you nominated, List of Houston Texans first-round draft picks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atlantis77177. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Muhammed Ali vs. Joe Frazier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:27, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Atlantis77177! The list you nominated, List of UEFA Champions League hat-tricks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]