User talk:Atakhawjey

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Information on Bhutan from the CIA, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Sarcasticidealist 07:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on KuzooNet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smokizzy 03:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You and Bramlet Abercrombie (talk · contribs) are engaged in a slow-motion edit war all over the Bhutan-related articles. If you revert that user one more time, on any page, I will block you, regardless of whether WP:3RR has been technically broken or not. Stop edit warring immediately, and try to get consensus with other editors on the article talk pages. Use dispute resolution if you have to. Try a third opinion or a request for comment. But I'm serious; revert Bramlet Abercrombie one more time and I will block you. ··coelacan 16:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi, thanks for your comment. i sure hope you've sent a similar msg to bramlet as well. he is the one who is applying the highest wikipedia standards to my contributions while ignoring most other links. for example, may be you can get a good justification from him for the constant edits of my input on the media of bhutan and bhutan times pages? the bhutantimes site is a significant item for the media of bhutan page because of its big popularity here in bhutan, as is kuzoo.net. kuzoo fm and radio valley are bhutan's FIRST two private radio stations. but he keeps reverting my contributions. if he quit reverting my edits, i wouldn't have to revert his reverts either. thanks.