User talk:Arwenz

Hi Arwenz. Thank you for your work on Lindbäcks. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the article. I've added some tags with instructions on how to fix the issues listed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dark oxygen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arwenz! Your additions to Agama Yoga have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 00:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lindbäcks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication found it meets N:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 02:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 02:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arwenz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I acted in good faith. I like to edit Wikipedia. I understood why I was blocked. I won't do this again. I will put all information in my own words. I thought that copying a single phrase from a newspaper is not a problem. I haven't been warned for this before so I think blocking me indefinitely is excessive and way too harsh. Arwenz (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 14:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

Arwenz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Blocking administrator: Star Mississippi (talk)

Reviewing administrator: Yamla (talk) 20:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request reason:

* Copyright means that the original creators of products (pieces of writing) and anyone they give authorization to are the only ones with the exclusive right to reproduce the work. The copyright owner has the right to control how their material is used. * Most of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) - Wikipedia:Copyrights - which means that is free to use Wikipedia's text for almost any purpose - as long as you attribute the authors (for example using a hyperlink to the article) and distribute the work (and any alterations or transformations) under the same or similar licenses . * Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. - Wikipedia:Copyright violations * We can use copyrighted content when the content is copyrighted and published under a compatible licence like GNU FDL or CC SA - or when copying a small part of the text and using quotations (fair use) - Wikipedia:Quotations#Fair_use * I will use my own words when I will mention the facts published in the references . Arwenz (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=* Copyright means that the original creators of products (pieces of writing) and anyone they give authorization to are the only ones with the exclusive right to reproduce the work. The copyright owner has the right to control how their material is used. * Most of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) - Wikipedia:Copyrights - which means that is free to use Wikipedia's text for almost any purpose - as long as you attribute the authors (for example using a hyperlink to the article) and distribute the work (and any alterations or transformations) under the same or similar licenses . * Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. - Wikipedia:Copyright violations * We can use copyrighted content when the content is copyrighted and published under a compatible licence like GNU FDL or CC SA - or when copying a small part of the text and using quotations (fair use) - Wikipedia:Quotations#Fair_use * I will use my own words when I will mention the facts published in the references . Arwenz (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}[reply]

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=* Copyright means that the original creators of products (pieces of writing) and anyone they give authorization to are the only ones with the exclusive right to reproduce the work. The copyright owner has the right to control how their material is used. * Most of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) - Wikipedia:Copyrights - which means that is free to use Wikipedia's text for almost any purpose - as long as you attribute the authors (for example using a hyperlink to the article) and distribute the work (and any alterations or transformations) under the same or similar licenses . * Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. - Wikipedia:Copyright violations * We can use copyrighted content when the content is copyrighted and published under a compatible licence like GNU FDL or CC SA - or when copying a small part of the text and using quotations (fair use) - Wikipedia:Quotations#Fair_use * I will use my own words when I will mention the facts published in the references . Arwenz (talk) 20:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}[reply]

@Star Mississippi:As blocking admin, what are your thoughts given the above response? --Yamla (talk) 20:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Yamla.

I mean it's not a CV because of how our text is released, but to me it doesn't read as if they understand it,simply reciting it. I have no objection if you decide to unblock since they're a fairly new user. However I'm not sure this gives me confidence we won't be right back here. Star Mississippi 00:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Secta Vidrenilor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]