User talk:ApsRay

Welcome!

Hello, ApsRay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 16:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 19:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie, thank you for your feedback. May i know which article and link you are referring to? I believe all of my links provide, generate relevant info and contributes to the article. However, I would like to hear your views too regarding this matter. ApsRay (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Every link you have added to apstellar.com MrOllie (talk) 11:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the links that you added were all dead.--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 21:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie, your suggestions may be inaccurate. I have not just contributed reference urls from 1 website source. In fact, I have provided an government agency link https://www.enterprisesg.gov.sg/overseas-markets/asia-pacific/thailand/contact-us on my first contribution in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enterprise_Singapore&oldid=1037949145 This link is working and valid til date. Also, I have contributed only 2 articles so far. Perhaps you could assess my references links when I have provided more contributions in future? There should be reference links from more sources in future, as I planned to contribute in different range of topics.

I would like to request if you could restore my contribution history, and let me continue to provide more contributions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ApsRay (talk • contribs)

Adding a government cite does not excuse also adding inappropriate links at the same time. Also, can you detail your relationship with apstellar? Based on your username it appears you are in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use as detailed in WP:PAID. - MrOllie (talk) 22:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie, I think you are offering accusations here.

Firstly, you accuse me of providing 1 sole reference source in two of my articles. I have since proved that I provided more than 1 referral source, and one of them is a government link.

Secondly, now you are suggesting the links I am sharing is inappropriate. Can you provide any evidence that my referral links are not relevant to my contributions? If Yes, please provide them accordingly.

Thirdly, you are questioning my identify. Regarding the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure article you mentioned, I can characteristically inform you that I <ref>am not being receiving any forms of paid compensation for my contributions to Wikipedia.

I appreciate any feedbacks from any users here, and I am also keen to learn from everyone. Especially I am new here, and I may do some thing inaccurate without realizing it. However, there must be proof or evidence for any forms of accusation made.

Please justify the three points I have mentioned. If not, I would appreciate that you remove your accusations & reinstate the version history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ApsRay (talk • contribs)

I'm not 'suggesting' anything, I am directly stating it: The links you added are inappropriate. Do not add links to that site again. - MrOllie (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie, thanks for the clarification. Since you are directing stating it, Please provide evidence of the three pointers I have mentioned. I have already shown elicit justifications, and it is only fair you explain your accusations too. If you do not have proof of what you are "directly stating", please retract your statement and reinstate the version history. Do note that this is an open platform and what you are posting here, will be judged by the open community. And for your information, I reserve my rights to post any source reference URL as long as it is befitting to the article and I am not being receiving any forms of paid compensation for my contributions to Wikipedia.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrOllie. Please answer my question and provide evidence of your accusation. Instead of shifting fences, citing policies and changing topics. You have not exhibited any single piece of fact so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ApsRay (talk • contribs)

We're not ever going to use spam links like company marketing blogs as sources. - MrOllie (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate if you could answer my questions and provide evidence of your accusation. Why you are shifting topics? Please show evidence for every single accusations you have mentioned.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Hi Admin, if you scroll through the messages, I have provided reasonable justification on my contributions. However, Mr. Ollie did not once show any proof of his/her accusations. I would request the admin to review unblocking me, and ban Mr. Ollie instead.  ~~~~}}

. Widr (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have blacklisted the website in question. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am only seeking a rational view of the situation here. There has been 0 factual opinions provided by other users and I been been blocked. Is this how Wikipedia users work? Functioning by their emotions.