User talk:Ankur9689

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Air quality in Delhi, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 talk 02:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ghazi Saiyyad Salar Masud without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 18:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stick to sources cited in the article instead of editing it in accordance with your point-of-view. Whether you think that a person should not be considered a saint or not is immaterial: if the sources state that he became reputed as a saint, that's what the article should state. utcursch | talk 18:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Naseeruddin Shah. Thank you. utcursch | talk 18:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mahmud of Ghazni, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]