User talk:Amarvashishth

Hi, Amarvashishth. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Somnath Bharti shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Hello. I understand how important it may be for you for the content to be retained. However, Wikipedia has rules governing number of reverts made by each editor within a 24 hour period. In this case, the removal of content by the other editor does not give you exemption to the rule. I can see that the other editor has posted a message at Talk:Somnath_Bharti#Wife. Please discuss the issue there, instead of simply reverting each others' edit. — Andrew Y _{talk contrib} 13:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea what you are doing here. You are adding something in the middle of a thread that is two years old and no longer relevant. The notability of the guy was questionable then but is not in doubt now because of his subsequent involvement in politics etc. - Sitush (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weren't you conscious enough then to get that he is new to politics so there has to be less information about him relating to :politics. Why you put a foot forward to say that the person is not Notable? He was a potential minister of Law for Delhi, :what made you say that he is not Notable. Isn't Law Ministers of the Nation's Capital seems not so Notable to you? What are you, a :pessimist? Amarvashishth (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At the time he was nothing. Trust me, I know what I am doing when it comes to simple things like this - I've been around here for a long time. The question is, why are you concerning yourself with stuff that was sorted out two years ago and is never going to be a problem again. Once someone is notable, they stay notable. Maybe read our guideline? - Sitush (talk) 15:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]